yup but every year we have 60-70 m losses which are covered by finnavest.. So who would invest in a company no matter how big it is if it makes a loss year in year out and to be honest currently cannot compete with top european clubs. Also the situation in which Serie A is it makes it slightly less attractive for investors IMO
I am aware of this, and I've said it before, there is massive untapped potential still for Milan.
You bring a guy like him here and you directly tap markets in the Far East. And I know how big of a following Milan has in the Gulf countries, in fact, most of the Middle East. With a passive attitude, we are just going to run around in circles. Sale of Silva is not the end of the world, it never is, but it will be a massive setback nevertheless.
And frankly my accounting is nothing special, but I sure would love to (or love someone else to) crunch the numbers. How come we are earning Top 5 level of coins in club football, but still end up with losses?
But nevertheless it would sure be great if an independent and accurate audit is done of all our finances and dealings in the last decade at least. We balance the books with Sheva, we balance the books with Kaka, now we balance the books with Silva and/or Ibra. The books sure do seem like they are begging for a review.
And if someone filthy rich wants to take over and invest a billion or half, then let him. Forget sentimentality if you have to, build your own stadium (even if it is a cheapo for a couple of hundred million) or buy out the San Siro and renovate. More importantly, have a direction.
Do what's necessary, but at least have an (upwards) direction and follow it. I'd be happy with 1m per year players like as long as they give their all, surrounded by one or two stars, than old dinosaurs costing the club 6 or 8 million year in and year out. The family thing should still continue, but it ought to be a two-way street from now on.
