QUOTE (Rossoneri7 @ Aug 17 2008, 02:19 PM)

Broochi, regardless of what the majorities opinion is on here of him (and I am one of those who don't consider him 'Milan quality'), still he is a utility player and he was the only stand in for either Gattuso or Ambrosini.
Gourcuff on the other hand trained for 2 seasons under Carlo. Carlo knows better than any of us about his ability. I don't keep defending Carlo, I have great respect for the man, regardless of what options he had at the bench, he defied the odds on many counts.
When we were down last season and needed a goal, and Carlo would sub in Brocchi for one of the defensive mids instead of putting in Yoann or another striker... It would be fine if he was used as just a replacement for Rino or Ambro but not the way Carlo uses him. And Brocchi should not be part of the team, he's not even good as a utility player, he's just bad and should have never been brought back in by the management. And for Carlo to continue using him is just irritating to no end especially when there are better players on the bench, now let's see what will happen to Cardacio and Viudez, if they suffer the same fate Gourcuff did.
Ads for Carlo seeing him in training, that's not enough, training is training, actually going out there on the pitch in a competitive match and giving him the time he needs is a totally different thing. He only defied the odds in 06/07 in the CL and that was mostly Kaka truning on some super human form for the CL. The other times he's won important titles for Milan he had probably the best squad in Europe at the time. Great defence, great midfield and great attack, and still having guys like Rui on the bench, I could have won the CL and the league with that squad.
QUOTE (Rossoneri7 @ Aug 17 2008, 02:19 PM)

Rivaldo was never in good terms with Ancelotti too, but what I am saying is he is a super star during that time.
But for Kaka' to take the place of the experience and intelligence of Rivaldo, as you said, he is special !
But I am not comparing Gourcuff to Kaka' han, what I am saying is, Gourcuff had a better chance at getting a starting place in the team. And in his first season, Carlo played him on several accounts he did play over 30 games in his first season at Milan han (even if most were for 20 mins). You remember when carlo brought him on against Bayern ? And they eat him up ?
Maybe .... WOW What a goal by Deco !!!!
Rivaldo was never good in Milan regardless of how Carlo felt about him. Like I said, it would have been easy for anyone to take his place, he just was never good enough for Milan
You are comparing their situations though, as in, if Kaka was able to do it then Yoann should be able to do it too. And despite us not having a team like we had when Kaka came in, the midfield was still practically the same as it was back then and anyone would find it hard to break into a midfield that had been playing together for years. It's just not the same situations and they can't be compared imo. I don't think he had that much minutes under his belt in his first season, I only remember a handful of games that he started in, other then that it was always 10 - 15 minutes here and there.
And against Bayern I agree he shouldn't have been brought in. Carlo put him in in important CL matches for some reason as if he wanted to see him fail. He's just a kid, Carlo should be giving him the chances in the league against small teams not against Bayern in the quarters of the CL!!!! And it's not like Brocchi did so well when he was put in CL games to replace Rino, remember Man U in Old Trafford after he replaced Rino? It was like playing a man short.
btw, James should have done better on that Deco goal