Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Summer 08 Transfer Window
AC Milan - Milanfan.com > AC Milan > Transfers
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107
Tennie
QUOTE (Giancarlo @ Aug 11 2008, 12:47 PM) *
It's absolutely certain we will now be getting Ivanovic. I wonder how much we sold Simic for. Monaco came as a surprise.


How do you know it's absolutely certain?
Giancarlo
QUOTE (vahid @ Aug 11 2008, 04:47 PM) *
We want to sign a loan deal with Ivanovic or want to buy him?


It's possible from the money we got from the Simic deal with Monaco, is that we could be surprised and he could be bought outright. But I'm uncertain about that.

Either way, management has listened and took it seriously. I told you guys not to listen to Galliani. He says crazy stuff, but he does the job when it comes down to it.

Every thing I wanted, management has got.
Giancarlo
QUOTE (Tennie @ Aug 11 2008, 04:48 PM) *
How do you know it's absolutely certain?


We sold a defender (Simic), and now we are totally shortchanged.

Didn't Juve want Ivanovic? Have we hijacked yet another deal they wanted?
Tennie
I think it's likely that Milan will sign a new defender now that Simic has gone.

I don't think one can say that it will FOR SURE happen, however. Things can sometimes go bad at the last minute.

Rumors have stated that the Zebras were looking at Ivanovic, yes.
Giancarlo
QUOTE (Tennie @ Aug 11 2008, 05:57 PM) *
I think it's likely that Milan will sign a new defender now that Simic has gone.

I don't think one can say that it will FOR SURE happen, however. Things can sometimes go bad at the last minute.

Rumors have stated that the Zebras were looking at Ivanovic, yes.


I'm always super confident about things heheheh... sometimes that gets me in trouble...

I guess I should wait for the official note. Yeah I hope they were looking at him, because I like it when Milan signs yet another player they've wanted.
Il Capitano
QUOTE (Giancarlo @ Aug 11 2008, 05:50 PM) *
We sold a defender (Simic), and now we are totally shortchanged.

Didn't Juve want Ivanovic? Have we hijacked yet another deal they wanted?


Yeah, they have been after him for a long time. First they lost Ivanovic to Chelsea and now he is probably gonna sign for us.

Now that simic has left I am pretty sure that the deal with Ivanovic is almost done.
Giancarlo
QUOTE (Il Capitano @ Aug 11 2008, 05:06 PM) *
Yeah, they have been after him for a long time. First they lost Ivanovic to Chelsea and now he is probably gonna sign for us.

Now that simic has left I am pretty sure that the deal with Ivanovic is almost done.


If this goes through, that will be a double blow for them. I've also heard they wanted Flamini earlier... lol...

They are having such a crappy transfer season. You would think with CL qualification and the funds that come from that they would get these players.
vahid
Didn't Chelsea signed him in few months ago?So can a player transfer two times in a transfer window?
Giancarlo
QUOTE (vahid @ Aug 11 2008, 05:18 PM) *
Didn't Chelsea signed him in few months ago?So can a player transfer two times in a transfer window?


Yeah, but yeah a player can transfer more than once in a transfer window... especially if this is a loan deal. It's not on the same level, but Milan does it a bit with youth players.
vahid
Excuse me for this questions but are they Crazy to sell a player that doesn't play for them?
Giancarlo
QUOTE (vahid @ Aug 11 2008, 05:34 PM) *
Excuse me for this questions but are they Crazy to sell a player that doesn't play for them?


He's not part of their plans... and they'll get money out of it... Ivanovic faces a lot of players ahead of him in Chelsea.... there is a lot of competition in that squad.
kurtsimonw
Chelsea signed him in January. DIfferent transfer window, different season.

He cost Chelsea £9m. We should get him much cheaper than that, but the way we've been losing money on players of late, i don't trust Galliani at all to get a good deal.
GrinReaper
QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Aug 12 2008, 12:48 AM) *
He cost Chelsea £9m. We should get him much cheaper than that, but the way we've been losing money on players of late, i don't trust Galliani at all to get a good deal.

It's a just a loan with the buy option. So if he's no good, we can always terminate the loan and Ivanovic goes back to Chelsea. But for his and Milan's sake, I hope he does extremely well. It's kind of a season long trial.
kurtsimonw
Hopefully. If he was to fail here, it could really ruin his career.. could very well be stuck in the Chelsea reserves for a couple of years.
GrinReaper
QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Aug 12 2008, 12:55 AM) *
Hopefully. If he was to fail here, it could really ruin his career.. could very well be stuck in the Chelsea reserves for a couple of years.

That's true. Because no big club would buy him and Chelsea would be hesitant to use him as well. I guess that would only leave the option of going to a lower club or playing on loan everywhere.
Giancarlo
QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Aug 11 2008, 06:18 PM) *
Chelsea signed him in January. DIfferent transfer window, different season.

He cost Chelsea £9m. We should get him much cheaper than that, but the way we've been losing money on players of late, i don't trust Galliani at all to get a good deal.


Where are we losing money on players? We got Ronaldinho on the cheap, we sold Oliveira for quite a good price and Gilardino too. We've haven't spent much for the players we got this transfer season. I think we spent less than 20 million euros.

Either way, for all of our sakes, I hope Ivanovic does brilliantly... I hope he booms to superb form... it'll be great for his career. Yes it's a risk to take, but it was his decision to make.
maldini03
Found this news on tuttomercato can somebody translate it please!
http://www.tuttomercatoweb.com/?action=read&id=117458
GrinReaper
QUOTE (Giancarlo @ Aug 12 2008, 01:19 AM) *
I think we spent less than 20 million euros.

Ronnie came for 25mill, didn't he?
Giancarlo
QUOTE (maldini03 @ Aug 11 2008, 07:49 PM) *
Found this news on tuttomercato can somebody translate it please!
http://www.tuttomercatoweb.com/?action=read&id=117458


I'll give it my best..

It basically says the agent stated that Ivanovic wants to play for Milan, and he has confirmed that there is a deal for 2 million on loan, and 10 million to buy.
maldini03
Thank you
So this means we are going to get him?
Giancarlo
QUOTE (GrinReaper @ Aug 11 2008, 07:52 PM) *
Ronnie came for 25mill, didn't he?


You have to take into account the money we made from sales... we got 10 million for Oliveira and 15 million for Gilardino.

Ronaldinho was bought for 21 million euros.

We financed much of our activity through sales.
Tennie
^^ Maldini03, that's the same information posted on page 279 (though it's a different media outlet): Ivanovic's agent saying negotiations are advanced, etc.

And Grin, I think that the Ronaldinho deal is supposed to have been under 20MM euros, though the exact transfer fee was never publicly announced.
Giancarlo
QUOTE (maldini03 @ Aug 11 2008, 07:53 PM) *
Thank you
So this means we are going to get him?


Lets wait till the official notice gets posted. smile.gif
GrinReaper
QUOTE (Giancarlo @ Aug 12 2008, 01:23 AM) *
You have to take into account the money we made from sales... we got 10 million for Oliveira and 15 million for Gilardino.

Ronaldinho was bought for 21 million euros.

We financed much of our activity through sales.

Aah, yes, taking into account our sales, the figure will be less than 20mill or even 15mill. I thought you only meant the buys. Anyhow, about Ronnie, I think I remember reading somewhere that the transfer fee will increase to 25mill due to some clauses.
Giancarlo
QUOTE (GrinReaper @ Aug 11 2008, 07:56 PM) *
Aah, yes, taking into account our sales, the figure will be less than 20mill or even 15mill. I thought you only meant the buys. Anyhow, about Ronnie, I think I remember reading somewhere that the transfer fee will increase to 25mill due to some clauses.


Yeah in total, after income brought in, we spent around 15 million Euros... which is quite astonishing for all the players we got. I'm very happy about Ronnie. Yes even if it does increase to 25 million, that's still quite low. And he's hitting his old form again... he had some great pace and many tricks in that Brazil-New Zealand game.

Despite the disappointing pre-season games, I'm still excited about the season... and if Ivanovic comes that will be great... a perfect transfer season in my eyes.
kurtsimonw
QUOTE (Giancarlo @ Aug 11 2008, 07:49 PM) *
Where are we losing money on players? We got Ronaldinho on the cheap, we sold Oliveira for quite a good price and Gilardino too. We've haven't spent much for the players we got this transfer season. I think we spent less than 20 million euros.

Losing money on players means that we're buying them.. then selling them for much less. It's happened to Ronaldo, Oliveira and Gila all very recently. Then bringing players in. Okay, Ronaldinho was about a fair price. But Boriello? For christ sake, he was our player, we then pretty much gave half of him away for nothing, then spent £6m getting back, terrible business. Then Zambrotta, he's 31, had 2 bad seasons, a bad Euro's.. and the we over-paid for him in my view.

I don't trust Galliani with trying to get good deals. If he did it alot, I'd have faith in this, even if he's a complete ***, but he does a bad job, so I can't have faith in him to get it done well.
Giancarlo
QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Aug 11 2008, 07:56 PM) *
Losing money on players means that we're buying them.. then selling them for much less. It's happened to Ronaldo, Oliveira and Gila all very recently. Then bringing players in. Okay, Ronaldinho was about a fair price. But Boriello? For christ sake, he was our player, we then pretty much gave half of him away for nothing, then spent £6m getting back, terrible business. Then Zambrotta, he's 31, had 2 bad seasons, a bad Euro's.. and the we over-paid for him in my view.

I don't trust Galliani with trying to get good deals. If he did it alot, I'd have faith in this, even if he's a complete ***, but he does a bad job, so I can't have faith in him to get it done well.


I don't agree with this at all. We got fair prices back on all of them and while management has made a few mistakes, they have made most of their money back. Borriello was brought back at an appropriate rate. Zambrotta was very solid in the Euro Cup... despite that one mistake against Romania. We didn't overpay for him. I thought the rate was appropriate.

And I think Galliani has an ability to get lower prices. He does a relatively good job most of the time. I do have faith in him. We've got many good deals... we got Flamini on free transfer for example...
Tennie
I'm with Kurt on this one. We've made losses on a lot of our recent transfers. Granted, the traitor to Chelsea for 40MM wipes away some of it (as does getting Flamini on a free) but Kurt's right.

As for Zambrotta...people who have been on the board for any length of time will probably remember my frequent posting of this: ( realmad.gif realmad.gif realmad.gif BRING US ZAMBROTTA!) for the better part of the year. 9MM euros is a lot for him. I love the guy, he's one of my favourite players. But to call his Euro solid...not even I would dare say that. The only Italian defender I'd say had a good Euro was Chiellini. That said, I'm more hopeful than I think some are that Zambrotta will return to something approximating his Zebra form. I'm of the opinion that the Spanish game just didn't suit him (and I don't think he particularly wanted to go to Barca anyway but that's another debate).
Giancarlo
QUOTE (Tennie @ Aug 11 2008, 09:13 PM) *
I'm with Kurt on this one. We've made losses on a lot of our recent transfers. Granted, the traitor to Chelsea for 40MM wipes away some of it (as does getting Flamini on a free) but Kurt's right.

As for Zambrotta...people who have been on the board for any length of time will probably remember my frequent posting of this: ( realmad.gif realmad.gif realmad.gif BRING US ZAMBROTTA!) for the better part of the year. 9MM euros is a lot for him. I love the guy, he's one of my favourite players. But to call his Euro solid...not even I would dare say that. The only Italian defender I'd say had a good Euro was Chiellini. That said, I'm more hopeful than I think some are that Zambrotta will return to something approximating his Zebra form. I'm of the opinion that the Spanish game just didn't suit him (and I don't think he particularly wanted to go to Barca anyway but that's another debate).


I think he's making up for those losses. I recognize he's made mistakes. But he's a human being. And a lot of clubs have made the same mistakes we did. I mean I thought Gilardino was gonna do very well with us. It didn't happen.

I tihnk Zambrotta is a superb player and I think he's definitely need to get his form back. Zambrotta WAS solid in the Euro Cup. I'll disagree with you on that one, sorry.
kurtsimonw
QUOTE (Giancarlo @ Aug 11 2008, 09:01 PM) *
I don't agree with this at all. We got fair prices back on all of them and while management has made a few mistakes, they have made most of their money back. Borriello was brought back at an appropriate rate. Zambrotta was very solid in the Euro Cup... despite that one mistake against Romania. We didn't overpay for him. I thought the rate was appropriate.

And I think Galliani has an ability to get lower prices. He does a relatively good job most of the time. I do have faith in him. We've got many good deals... we got Flamini on free transfer for example...

I'm not questioning whether Borielloe, Gilardino, etc. are appropriate rates at that time. I agree in the case of Boriello and Gila that they were, but that's not the point. We had Boriello, he came through our ranks, he cost nothing. Then we give half to Genoa, for basically nothing.. then we buy that half back for £6m? That is bad business, because we had him for free in the first place, we basically wasted £6m.

Same goes for Gila, we bought him for about £17m, then sold him for about half. His performances are irrelevant, we made a bad signing which we lost money on = bad business, same for Oliveira. It doesn't work like this all the time, obviously if players are getting old their value will decrease anyway, but we're talking about throwing around £10m away on these to transfers.

Buying players for money, them sucking, then selling them for less in just not good business basically. Milan buy players at what we think they're worth.. if we then sell them for less, we obviously negotiated poorly in the beginning/over-paid for them. Like with Sheva we made money = good business.
Giancarlo
QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Aug 11 2008, 08:20 PM) *
I'm not questioning whether Borielloe, Gilardino, etc. are appropriate rates at that time. I agree in the case of Boriello and Gila that they were, but that's not the point. We had Boriello, he came through our ranks, he cost nothing. Then we give half to Genoa, for basically nothing.. then we buy that half back for £6m? That is bad business, because we had him for free in the first place, we basically wasted £6m.


We had to pay something to Genoa because he produced results and his value went up. This isn't bad business. This is just a fact of life. We didn't waste anything on him I don't think.

QUOTE
Same goes for Gila, we bought him for about £17m, then sold him for about half. His performances are irrelevant, we made a bad signing which we lost money on = bad business, same for Oliveira. It doesn't work like this all the time, obviously if players are getting old their value will decrease anyway, but we're talking about throwing around £10m away on these to transfers.


I thought he would have been a great player for us. I can't agree with you again. We took a risk and that's how business works. Like Pato... that was a well worth risk that had rewards. It doesn't denote bad business. I'm not going to change my opinion here. Zambrotta has his worth and will regain his form with Milan.

QUOTE
Buying players for money, them sucking, then selling them for less in just not good business basically. Milan buy players at what we think they're worth.. if we then sell them for less, we obviously negotiated poorly in the beginning/over-paid for them. Like with Sheva we made money = good business.


We take risks and some of these risks are well worth it. Viudez and Cardacio were bought very cheaply... so I'm more in favor of that.

You have to take risks, and somethings risks don't work out.

I'm happy with Galliani and I think he should stick around. He's great and despite his mouth, he knows what he's doing. We have to take calculated risks. I was in favor of buying Oliveira at the time too... it didn't work out. THat's a fact of life.
CrazyMilanFan
u seems that all the rumours were not that gud as they said he will sign for us today but that does not seem to happen letsee what happens
Giancarlo
QUOTE (CrazyMilanFan @ Aug 11 2008, 08:31 PM) *
u seems that all the rumours were not that gud as they said he will sign for us today but that does not seem to happen letsee what happens


Wait a bit. Simic being sold now makes it necessary for us to get another defender. And I'm sure some money was transferred. This deal may not be announced till a bit later on... I hear midnight.
kurtsimonw
Some Summer transfer news, but un-Milan related..

QUOTE
www.avfc.co.uk can reveal Villa have agreed a fee with Rangers for Spanish defender Carlos Cuéllar and are set for talks with the player.

Villa today made a bid that invoked a release clause in Cuéllar's Rangers deal.

The Madrid-born centre-half, 27 later this month, moved to Ibrox from La Liga side Osasuna last summer and enjoyed an outstanding debut season in the SPL.

He collected the Clydesdale Bank SPL Player of the Year award and was named the Scottish Football Writers Associations Player of the Year.

Speaking as Villa's bid was confirmed Cuéllar told the official Rangers website: "I came to Rangers due to the professional manner of their officials and management and their promise of success. Everything I had been told about this fantastic Club has been true and last year's UEFA Cup run is something I will never forget.

"My ambition has always been to play for my national team and I believe that playing in the biggest league in the world for Aston Villa will help me realise that.

"When I told Martin Bain on Sunday that I wanted to leave, I did so with sadness. The Rangers supporters have been fantastic to me, but I am young and want to play at the highest level and I hope they will always welcome me back. I want to thank them for everything."

Stay tuned to www.avfc.co.uk for any developments

AVFC

Would be a quite amazing signing for us.

Fiorentina fans may remember him from last years UEFA Cup semi final 2nd leg, where he turn up to the game as brick wall and let nothing through. biggrin.gif
Giancarlo
QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Aug 11 2008, 09:39 PM) *
Some Summer transfer news, but un-Milan related..


Would be a quite amazing signing for us.

Fiorentina fans may remember him from last years UEFA Cup semi final 2nd leg, where he turn up to the game as brick well and let nothing through. biggrin.gif


I know a Rangers fan that would literally scream at that prospect.

But since they fell out to Kaunas... it could very well happen. Rangers lost around 10 million Euros by losing that game.
Tennie
That's a good signing for Villa, Kurt. Well done. smile.gif
Tennie
Gazzetta is reporting that the deal for Ivanovic will be concluded tomorrow. The English press (the Times, which is relatively reliable) has also picked up the story.
Zed.D
If we're going to sign Ivanovic on loan then I hope an option to buy him for a stated price is included in his contract since Chelsea's management are a bunch of pirates. as soon as Ivanovic plays well for us, they'll do a Crespo to us when his loan deal runs out.
han2503
QUOTE (zdrossoneri @ Aug 12 2008, 01:06 PM) *
If we're going to sign Ivanovic on loan then I hope an option to buy him for a stated price is included in his contract since Chelsea's management are a bunch of pirates. as soon as Ivanovic plays well for us, they'll do a Crespo to us when his loan deal runs out.

Crespo was partly our fault also. We decided not to go ahead with the negotiations to buy him and instead went for Gila...
Zed.D
QUOTE (han2503 @ Aug 12 2008, 04:15 PM) *
Crespo was partly our fault also. We decided not to go ahead with the negotiations to buy him and instead went for Gila...


Yes, partly, but Chelsea are like this nonetheless. they want the most money possible out of every deal.
Rossoneri7
QUOTE (zdrossoneri @ Aug 12 2008, 03:06 PM) *
If we're going to sign Ivanovic on loan then I hope an option to buy him for a stated price is included in his contract since Chelsea's management are a bunch of pirates. as soon as Ivanovic plays well for us, they'll do a Crespo to us when his loan deal runs out.


Gazzetta reported the estimated price ... 2MM for the loan and 10MM for the buy clause.


Personally, I don't care if its 10 or 50 ... It's not coming out of my pocket anyways biggrin.gif
Zed.D
QUOTE (Rossoneri7 @ Aug 12 2008, 06:46 PM) *
Personally, I don't care if its 10 or 50 ... It's not coming out of my pocket anyways biggrin.gif


Me neither wink.gif I'm worried about Galliani saying 'Chelsea demand too much, we can't have him' when his loan spell ends. I've got this feeling that he will turn out good...
Giancarlo
QUOTE (zdrossoneri @ Aug 12 2008, 03:39 PM) *
Me neither wink.gif I'm worried about Galliani saying 'Chelsea demand too much, we can't have him' when his loan spell ends. I've got this feeling that he will turn out good...


Depends on how big the contract stipulation is and how good he turns out. I still believe we're also gonna get Alex Silva who will be affordable too.
Tennie
Why Silva? Why not an ITALIAN?
Giancarlo
QUOTE (Tennie @ Aug 12 2008, 06:31 PM) *
Why Silva? Why not an ITALIAN?


Well I'd like Chiellini, but I'm being realistic.

And besides that it won't be as if the nationality level will change much before. Ivanovic replaces Simic... and we had a Brazilian defender before, Cafu... the only Brazilian defender we have now is Digao... he's not getting first team choice that's for sure. So I don't see an issue getting Alex Silva
vahid
QUOTE (Tennie @ Aug 12 2008, 05:31 PM) *
Why Silva? Why not an ITALIAN?


Maybe they are more expensive!
Il Capitano
There arent that many good Italian defenders like it used to be.
vahid
QUOTE (Il Capitano @ Aug 12 2008, 07:20 PM) *
There arent that many good Italian defenders like it used to be.


There are!But big Italian clubs doesn't expect to them.Like Barzagli and Zaccardo,both of them transferred to Germany.
Giancarlo
QUOTE (vahid @ Aug 12 2008, 08:28 PM) *
There are!But big Italian clubs doesn't expect to them.Like Barzagli and Zaccardo,both of them transferred to Germany.


I think there are many great Italian defenders even today but I don't think Barzagli or Zaccardo are examples of that.
vahid
QUOTE (Giancarlo @ Aug 12 2008, 07:31 PM) *
I think there are many great Italian defenders even today but I don't think Barzagli or Zaccardo are examples of that.


I like them,so they are examples of that tongue.gif
So who are they great Italian defenders?Just Chiellini?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2026 Invision Power Services, Inc.