When did I say QPR got lucky? they've just parked the bus! Man U got lucky.

You say it as if it's all down to United's luck, as far as I'm aware their goal was legit, both QPR's goals were too, if anything City's goal was a complete fluke from a howler from the keeper.

If City won here they'd have won the league, United wouldn't have mattered. Complete choke so far.

It's a complete choke. I'm not even watching the game, but giving away the title like this is unbelievable. It's like Lazio-Inter of 2002, only like 10x easier for City.

Exactly.

Indeed. Complete choke.

2-2

EDIN!!

3-2
WOWOWOWO

What a game!

Who mentioned choke

Agueroooooooooooo

Wow!

Glad to be wrong bro
soooooo glad to be wrong!!!

Mancio's subs always make difference when I watch them.

Edin and Balo (assist).

What a league, what a league.

That's why I disagree, it'd have been unfair if they didn't win this.

Chances is something like 30-3


FT. Champs. **** MANURE!

So that's what destiny feels like. Gonna have to download and save this match as well.

Unbelievable!

Best league ending I've ever seen.

Would it be correct to say that City won in in true Manchester United style?

Anyone knows if Man U players were celebrating when it was 1-2 and well past the 90th minute?

Bolton went down too

Mancini wearing an Italian flag/cape

Fucking Epic

Congrats City! Deserved.

Another nail in the coffin that is sports. Unsurprisingly City benefit hugely from the refs and win, shocker.

Now we just need FFP to finish it off.

What's with that?

Only just noticed it, WTF!?

Is he crying because they managed to get the 3rd spot? How sad.

They just showed it on MotD. He was sort of leaning over as I'm assuming Arsenal were having a chance and he did that after they missed for some reason.

It was Pat Rice's last game with Arsenal, by the way, 44 years with the club.

Ah, OK. Better that way.

that's too bad for them

Well at least we can laugh at them screwing up worse than us.

Unsurprisingly McLeish has been sacked.

*yawn*

Wonderful input.

Bye Carlos.

You and Ash post constant digs at 'modern football' and its various 'flaws'. If it bothers you that much, quit following teams.

I also find it hilarious that people slag off City's title win as 'bought' when Man Utd are full of multimillion pound players too, yet not a single bloody word is ever said against that.

Didn't quite manage that Spanish call up he so craved. Love how his 'King Carlos' moniker is attributed to Villa fans!

I think he deserved it in 2010 honestly, he was better than the likes of Marchena. But I think they were all regulars.

Yeah, the only reason we called him King Carlos was because that was essentially his nickname, started by you lot.

As for United/City, we've been through it. My opinion is just as valid as yours. If you're fine with it, that's your call. I'm just not personally.

What are you on about now?

But the point is while your opinion is valid, it's just a bit bizarre and slightly contradictory to support teams when you constantly condemn 'modern football'.

Read the words and you might find out.

I've condemned City, not modern football. As I've said before United earned their way to the top, they got their rewards for being an outstanding business. Even Chelsea earned their way to CL. City are a nothing club and earned nothing. That's the reality of the situation.

Big difference between United spending £50m that they made and City spending £50m they happened to come in to. If you can't see that, then that's your opinion, doesn't mean I'm going to agree with it.

"Another nail in the coffin that is sports."

Sounds like you're condemning modern football to me.



You...do realise Man Utd are in nearly £500M debt? They haven't technically earned a penny - anything they have spent on players should have been going to their creditors. They spend the money they receive on players, instead of clearing off the debts.

Yeah, outstanding business!

Whereas City have no debt.

It's like you're praising Utd for being in debt and being taken over by a family who appear to have put none of their own money into the club, while condemning City for being taken over by a group who could clear the debt and improve the squad.

No, City. Because they won the title without earning it.


Well it's not true, the Ronaldo money went to debt, but that's not important. United's post-Glazers I don't agree with, they have ruined the club. During the 90s though when United became dominant? Did they spend the most, yeah. But they also weren't in a debt going out of control. Under the Glazers they haven''t spend a crazy amount of money and have an overall profit on transfer dealings. It's just a shame what the Glazers are doing elsewhere.

You know, what Vincent Kompany said was spot on. As kids, the majority of City players were poor - their ability in football took them out of that and now they're champions. Most of them are not bothered about the money, they just want to win. At the end of the day, they're footballers who won the league - if you're trying to say they didn't earn it based on some sour grapes about club turnover, it just seems petty.



One sale, mainly because who else have Utd sold at a significant profit in the last few years? Can't think of many, can you? Lots of dregs like O'Shea, Bardsley and others. But not a lot of valuable sales.



So it's all about the money money money? But it doesn't matter if it's not City.



Irrelevant. In every single way.



Your 'condemnation' of Utd's currently atrocious business model is forced whereas you're passionately against City.

If Berlusconi shells out 100M on badly needed players, are you going to condemn him for buying the title if we win it next season?

Since that C Ron sale Utd have spent 15M on Valencia, 20M on Young, 20M on Jones, 20M on De Gea, 5M on Hernandez; about 80M. So that money, which at the time was supposed to go into creditors, ends up going back out on signings again.

Did I say the players didn't deserve it? no. But how many of these players would be there if not for oil money. 3? Maybe 4?

And yeah, they do care about the money. That's why I won't be continuing this, quite baffling comment to make.

Oh and Dalglish has been sacked. Dreadful manager and even worse person. Good riddance. Shame Liverpool might push on without him.

Kenny sacked at Liverpool. I think Martinez is the favourite?

What?! Can't Liverpool get some love on this forum?