QUOTE (KillerMax @ Jan 3 2009, 11:03 PM)

The only real difference is that an 18 year old with great potential has more to prove, is hungrier, learns faster, is generally faster, has more energy and can become something great for the team. Such player must be eased into the squad. On the other hand, a 38 year old has experience and is more tactically sound, but lacks the physical attributes to serve his team fully. That's why most player retire at around 34-35 and most top teams let players around that age go.
+1
QUOTE
Teams like Real and Barca have some gems on their hand right now because they gave chances to their youngsters with great potential. To me, there is not too much difference in the level quality between Paloschi and Iniesta 4-5 seasons ago. What do we do? We loan out the player, co-own him and rinse and repeat until the player is well over 25... What do they do? They ease the player into the first team squad, slowly but surly. Now Iniesta is their vice-captain and a youth product. I think there is something to be learned here. We did great with Maldini and Costacurta, but that's a long long time ago.
I wouldn't compare Milan with other top European teams in that respect. every team has a weak point, ours is our inability to make superstars out of unknown youngsters. since 2000 onwards, who, beside Pato and Kaka, has made it to our first XI as a youngster? Paloschi came very close but he got loaned out

QUOTE (dst @ Jan 3 2009, 11:08 PM)

It is interesting. Milan showing interest in a young player, especially a young defender is not so common.
He would not be signed as the next big thing though so don't worry.
I say, we have a couple of young defenders ourselves; why would we want to look at a Serie B team's defender? it doesn't make any sense to me...
QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ Jan 4 2009, 12:16 AM)

I don't understand this. We're not happy/interested in signing young defenders, we don't wan't veterans either. Either to young or to old, as long as it carries a bad omen. What do we want? I get the impression we're searching and yearning for something that is a priori unreachable?
I for one am interested in signing an established defender, whose age is between ~20 and ~30. no more [past it has-beens like Canna], no less [youngsters who won't get more than 10 minutes in a season!]
QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ Jan 4 2009, 12:18 AM)

You want me to say there are 21-or-so better defenders avaible in Fluminense, Brazil, or?
I know and respect you rethoric skills, but for the sake of the argument, name them.
No, I've already said imo Santacroce is a really good defender. at least better than a 35yo Cannavaro, or a 19yo Serie B defender.
QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ Jan 4 2009, 01:28 AM)

No one really answered to my post. Pato does not count? I don't rate both Grimi and Gourcuff that much to make them an example for young players at Milan. And I don't see the coach as a main problem.
Now we know everything better and we sure would develop Viudez and Cardacio. After all, we all know exactly how good they are, what they can offer, how mentally fit the might be and the rest as well, right?
Yeah, yeah,...Ancelotti destroyed the exemptional talents of Grimi, Viudez, Cardacio and especially Gourcuff. Just like he wanted to to with Henry, right?
Ancelotti is not the problem anymore, everyone knows he is no Wenger, i.e. not a great coach in
that respect. question is, why do we keep buying youngsters?