Official. They also might buy Witsel for 30m.

Milan CL list for the group stages:

Abate, Abbiati, Acerbi, Ambrosini, Amelia, Antonini, Boateng, Bonera, Constant, De Jong, De Sciglio, Robinho, El Shaarawy, Emanuelson, Flamini, Bojan Krkic, Mesbah, Mexes, Montolivo, Nocerino, Pazzini, Pato, Gabriel, Yepes, Zapata.

B-list: Carmona, Ganz, Narduzzo.

Out Traoré and Niang.

Is Traore really that bad?

Is Traore really that bad?

I'd take the old Brocchi over him, given the one match I did see him play. Brocchi was not too capable but at least had an idea of what to do , even though he failed to do it.

Traore is just without direction. So is Flamini but at least Flamini has some ability.

Witsel official too. The updated numbers are Hulk for 60m and Witsel for 40m. 100m euros in one night

Are Zenit really that rich of a club?

Are Zenit really that rich of a club?

Haven't you heard of Gazprom? Every January they hold all Europe in their gass-game.

Witsel official too. The updated numbers are Hulk for 60m and Witsel for 40m. 100m euros in one night

I read Hulk was signed for €45 million, not €60.

Ahh, didn't know they were owned by Gazprom...

Thought Anzhi were the only super rich club in Russia

Price Fillipo, priCe!

Say what?

Falcao is, dare I say it, worth more than 50M. He is simply stupidly good, and if he keeps up the form of the past 2 or 3 seasons he could become the greatest striker of all time.

He has made world class teams looks absolutely ordinary and scores on all occasions. 30 in 37 for AM is a quite incredible return, as good as Messi or Ronaldo in a way inferior team. His record for Porto was just as good.

He is incredible. If he was a woman I'd marry him. Hell I'll marry him anyway.

But I agree, Falcao along with Ibra are the two best of this current generation. Always amazing watching them play!

What happened to your precious Gomez?

True, but we'll get to see him more (and maybe perform better) with Chelsea. That will further cement his legend. As for the best striker of all time, for me, personally that slot is taken. Ronaldo, the Brazilian phenomenon. But I agree, Falcao along with Ibra are the two best of this current generation. Always amazing watching them play!

Agreed. Ronaldo did things back then that nobody does today other than Me$$i and in ANY team he played for. No "team needs to play to his strengths" BS

Paris Saint-Germain and Zenit watch on as Uefa gets tough over new Financial Fair Play ruling

Two of Europe's biggest spenders will be forced to take note after Atletico Madrid were among 23 clubs to be denied prize-money by the European governing body

Every uprising starts with a show of defiance, and this morning UEFA gave notice to Europe’s top clubs that there is more to their demands for financial sustainability than words alone.

The announcement that 23 clubs have had their prize-money from last season’s European competitions withheld due to their financial issues will have drawn a mixed response from all four corners of the continent.

The likes of Atletico Madrid, Malaga, Fenerbahce and Sporting Lisbon have until September 30 to either settle their debts or explain to European football’s governing body exactly why they have not paid players, other clubs or the taxman.

It is the first blow in what is likely to be a long and bitter battle in which lawyers and accountants will have more impact on our game than centre-backs or second strikers.

That Atletico, the reigning Europa League champions, were included on the list will have drawn a sharp intake of breath from all clubs.

In Spain, where the financial crisis threatens to strangle everyone bar Barcelona and Real Madrid, there will be genuine fear of what may follow from Michel Platini’s baby, the UEFA Club Finance Control Body (CFCB), who have chosen this opportunity to flex their muscles.

In the blue half of Manchester and the townhouses of Chelsea, comes the acknowledgement that spending must be curbed.

In Paris and Russia, the shining beacons for players and agents seeking a healthy pay-day, there will be a large dose of trepidation.

And for Arsene Wenger, the man who has embraced Financial Fair Play (FFP) from the very beginning, there will be a quiet smile of satisfaction.

FFP is Platini’s grand plan, one in which European clubs must reduce their debts over an audited period of time. Between 2011 and 2014, no club is allowed to lose more than £39.5m. Between 2014 and 2017 that is reduced to £26.3m and then, hopefully, all clubs will break even.

If not, the punishment is simple; clubs that fall foul of the rules will be banned from the Champions League and Europa League.

And when Platini’s ideas come to fruition, this will be seen as an important moment in this well-advertised sea-change.

Yet the actions of some clubs suggest they do not take him seriously, not yet at least.

Qatari-backed Paris Saint-Germain are a gilded club with an impressive history, but it will be interesting to see how they reduce their losses by 2014, as UEFA require, having spent around £120m on the likes of Zlatan Ibrahmovic, Thiago Silva and Ezequiel Lavezzi this summer.

Similarly, Zenit St Petersburg – whose average attendance was 3,000 less than Reading last season – have just spent between £64 and £80m (depending on who you believe) on Hulk and Axel Witsel.

These are not the actions of clubs who feel financial Armageddon is coming.

Yet Platini has never deviated, never changed from his insistence that the day of reckoning was near.

"These rules were unanimously approved by all clubs, politicians, judges and the European Union. There's no going back from here on,” he told Gazzetta dello Sport at the end of August.

“FFP is a hard rule for any team, regardless of whether we're talking about PSG, Juventus, or any other team.

"I have spoken with directors from all clubs. They have all stressed that they would follow the new rules. It seems that some worry a bit more about FFP than others, though.

"Financial Fair Play does not stop clubs from buying players. Clubs can still spend as much as they want as long as their budget accounts for it."

The question now is how PSG, Zenit and the rest can justify it. Over-inflated sponsorship deals have been discussed, as have an increase of equity for their owners in exchange for greater finance.

But the example of Malaga is one that Platini is sure to refer to time and again.

The list announced today gives the clubs named until September 30 to settle their debts or explain why they had not paid either players, other clubs or the tax authorities money that was owed.

In the case of Malaga, the answer is simple; because the billionaire owner, Sheikh Abdullah bin Nasser al-Thani of the Qatari royal family, seemingly lost interest and the funds dried up.

Santi Cazorla was then sold at a knock-down price to Wenger and Arsenal, solely so that the players could be paid. Withholding prize money will only exacerbate the situation, but Platini had to make a stand.

Clubs such as Chelsea, Manchester City, Paris Saint Germain and Malaga are all indebted to owners that they could not cope without.

The Frenchman, a football politician who is surely destined for Sepp Blatter’s chair at FIFA, will not countenance that.

And, under the leadership of former Belgian Prime Minister Jean-Luc Dehaene, CFCB have been told to crack down.

No-one has been banned from European competitions – not yet, at least.

But Atletico Madrid could lose out on up to £7.9m in prize money, an eye-watering figure for any accountant.

And the message that is coming from UEFA’s HQ this morning is loud and clear; Platini is watching, and the day of judgement is coming.

So let me get this: Atletico overspent, can't afford to pay whatever so UEFA's response is to deny them prize money?

Platini: Killing football since 2007.

Yeah. Coz it's unfair to teams in Europe, who you know..actually live within their budgets that they can't compete, since teams like Atletico are essentially doping 'financially'. Could they have gotten a Falcao without unserviceable debts for e.g? And without Falcao could they have won anything. We don't know.

Yeah. Coz it's unfair to teams in Europe, who you know..actually live within their budgets that they can't compete, since teams like Atletico are essentially doping 'financially'. Could they have gotten a Falcao without unserviceable debts for e.g? And without Falcao could they have won anything. We don't know.

In any case, I think UEFA are absolutely right. If you have no methods to pay your debts you shouldn't be taking them and investing that money.

Especially considering this shift was endorsed by most (if not all) of the major European clubs.

Did you seriously use the word 'fair'?

Is it 'fair' that clubs like Milan, United, City, Madrid, PSG, Barca, etc. have overspent for decades, won as a result and been able to market themselves because of the money they spent?

Is it 'fair' that clubs from small cities generally don't get big crowd, can't sell much merchandise all because they happen to be from a certain area?

Well, to put Milan in the same basket with all those clubs isn't exactly fair either.

Small cities? That's life. Life isn't fair as well.

Of course it was, they're the ones who benefit.

Europa quality teams generally don't make a profit. Villa made a profit on trasnfers a few years ago, qualified for the Europa League and made a loss. CL teams are usually the only money makers so by FFP rules they're the only ones allowed to spend. As I said before, it's keeping the cycle going and ensuring the big CL clubs remain in the CL.

It makes no sense to call this 'fair play'.

That's like saying people in Africa can't afford education, so them not having food is 'fair' since they don't have the money for it. Whereas I deserve my food, house, quality of living because I can afford it. It's not 'fair' at all, I just happened to be very fortunate to live where I do (just as big clubs are fortunate to be from big cities and have that marketability).

Sadly United and Chelsea are well within FFP norms. Or am I the only one who read of the mega rich sponsorships deals signed with Chevrolet and Gazprom respectively?

It will only make sense when it is fully functional and you start seeing the results. As far as your concerned, if Villa finish 7th and don't qualify for Europe, your Villa does not have to meet the FFP guidelines.

Joe Hart...

Every goalie is a typical English goalie? Who knew.