QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ Sep 20 2010, 02:21 AM)

Or maybe Silvo wanted a real coach not an amateur rookie.
Then he probably should have.

I remember pundits and former players all praising Leo in the first half of the season, saying he was the only one who brought tactical innovation to Serie A. I reckon I read a Sacchi interview in Football Italia saying he was very pleased with how Leonardo managed things. Not just that, the media (Italian and World) was all over Leo for standing up to Berlusconi.
It was when we reached 2nd place during a very successful run when Leo issued his 5-point ultimatum.

And by golly he was right with what he said and wanted. Out with the old players, and in with the new and whatnot. Most people were praising him after that. Then injuries hit (Nesta and Pato in particular), and he started showing inexperience (if that's what you want to call it). Frankly the last few matches were a total mess, with Huntelaar playing as a winger, and well the less we talk about those the better.
I am not for one instance saying Leo was a miracle man, or the greatest thing to happen to the club, far from it. And he had a lot of flaws too, not playing youngsters, technically somewhat naive, playing 4-3-3 even though he did not have the required personal for it (when it worked, it worked wonders, when it didn't it was worse than a slap in the face). And these are just some of his faults. Speaking of which he also had the 2nd biggest hand in ruining Hunts time in Milan (the first being the player himself).

The Hunter should be in the penalty box most of the 90 minutes, not wandering out of it. His job was to finish any through ball and put them in the back of the net, not playing Mr. Wingman.
But fact of the matter is that he did not get a single player he wanted (in fact barely got any reinforcement), lost the club icon (Maldini) and face (Kaka) before playing his first match, had to work with a chubby Ronaldinho, along with the saggy midfield. Let's face it, I was proud of our midfield up till the 2007 season, being on record saying that it was the best in Europe, and now I am practically willing to give a two-finger salute to the old guard (Ambro, Gattuo, Seedorf and I hate saying this, Pirlo).

It's not their fault that they are still starting, and that their performance has been going downhill after every match, but at any other big club they'd make the second string backups. The way other 3rd class teams counter us and carve our midfield like unsalted butter makes my heart cringe. Sure it's got to do with both the formation, but the players aren't helping are they?
Getting back to Leo, would I have taken him for another season with these signings? Yes, probably, but only if he made certain changes to his tactics, learned from his experience, and was willing to be a bit more accommodating when it came to formations. If not, then there always are, and will be better coaches available. For all intent and purposes Allegri isn't one of them. Twice coach of the year means nothing, seeing as Leo was one for the previous season.

It's what you do with it. And so far Allegri has just been taking Leo's style and has already looked lost. Early times I know, and I am more than willing to cut him a lot of slack and truth be told, my slate for Allegri is clean and will be till the end of the season. That's the time to judge, not now.
Leo with a team like this could have accomplished much more (or could not, there is no way to know). I'd be willing to be the farmhouse that if our new coach had the same old team (as in no singing this summer), then we'd have to be the luckiest club in the world to finish 4th. All our players would have been a year older, while teams like Palermo and Samp have grown stronger, they'd be a shoe in for the CL spots along with Roma and inter. If anything I am happy that Allegri got all these new toys to play with, but in reality it could make things 10x more difficult for him if things don't work out. The pressure is immense, though I have been impressed with how he is coping with it for the time being.
I never was a fan of Leo either as a player, or even a coach (didn't quite get to see his play very often). But at least he secured us 3rd place, and did the minimum, which is more than what could be said of our former friend and ally that goes by the name of Carlo. I mean 5th place for Pete's sake with a two years younger team with Kaka in it. A terribly weakened Juventus finished third with 72 points while we could muster just 64. A team that won the CL a year back fails to qualify next season, and that too in a weakened Serie A. LOL, that's rich!

Remember how he lost two consecutive with Juventus, one to Lazio and other Roma? I do not take back what Carlo accomplished with us (seeing as how things were when he first signed), he did good. Two points was the difference, many of the two points Carlo gave away on the road playing either too defensively or with joke of players such as Emerson (who he himself wanted, albeit a few years earlier). Rookie coach you say? Well that rookie just saved us from another humiliation of missing the CL twice in three years. And besides, how many rookies get a chance to manage a Top 5 club in world football and live to tell the tale (this side of Pep, of course). He won a bronze, and maybe with better luck and or tactical knowledge could have made a case for silver or gold. Not saying we deserved gold, or even silver, the squad and team had their faults.
Anyway, in my opinion coaches are terribly overrated anyways, the real coaches are one the ones that people ride on when they travel. There have been some pretty good ones in world football over the history, but for me the best coach is that accomplishes two things - iron out and work around the weak areas of a team, and motivate the players to go beyond what they are capable of. A bit of man management always helps. For club football, the two primary things that matter are the management and the players themselves who fight it out on the pitch. Any half decent coach could and should be able to carve out a strategy for the opposing team and hold training exercises with a whistle in his mouth.

A guy like Louie Van Gaal is a pretty good example. So is Guus Hiddink. Most others either get very lucky or terribly unlucky.
Han, in many ways is the best of us, when it comes to judging things. And if he says Leo was treated unfairly, I'm with him. He had his flaws, yes, and yes, I would have a very hard time rating him higher than "B", but at least the guy tried and gave his all. If the ideas was to sign Allegri and shower him with gifts (and don't tell me otherwise, remember how at the start of the transfer season Mr. B said that if a champion was there for signing, he would), then we could have kept Leo. Because on the last day of the match I saw another side of him, the hidden one. His rapport with the players. His team was ready to die with him literally. And this is something that has to be earned, not bought as Berlusconi likes to believe. That for me is a sign of good coach. Lookie, lookie:



Terribly long post, I know, but my $0.02 cents are that if the management wanted to win something, and signed a bucket load of players, spilling all amounts of cash, then as Porty said in the match thread, they should have made the effort of pulling in a weathered, wily, and experienced coach with white hair. Somebody who had at least won a major trophy before. Not another amateur in Masimiliano Allegri.

If they did though, then man up and let him do his work, give him a few years (unlike Leo) to make his mark. And learn to keep their beak shut (I am looking at your, Mr. Berlusconi) instead of opening their mouth twice a month to the media. As for Leonardo, I am glad that chapter is over, the last few rounds very pretty ugly and unbearable. Thanks for everything, and best of luck to you wherever you go next. Regrets I have a few, but there were more than one good moments last season!