QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ Mar 12 2016, 02:57 PM)

Did Juve break any other Milan record recently? Anyway, agreed on that part Han, nicely put.
What I don't agree with you is your ageism thing and the answer you gave me.
Yes, Spalletti was a viable option. A loser coach who has nevertheless experience enough to master us through. Agreed. Yet the very fact that you came up with one name shows it all. Then you mention Hiddink and LvG out of no where, what gives you the idea they'd consider Milan or Italy? Hiddink came back to Chelsea because he could easily link up with the environment there he already knew. That's the same we tried with Capello. Now you say trying to bring don Fabio on board is a clueless/idealess try, but at the same time you propose another old coach who's never even coached in Italy?
I fail to see the logic in that, but I know, you're probably gonna say Hiddink is more vital the don Fabio and coached clubs more recently. Well, to me it's hardly enough.
The way I see this is that we have limited option:
A. We sign someone completely unknown who has links with Milan - we've done this twice and it didn't come out good.
B. We sign an more or less ambitious coach who'd consider Milan a next (good) step in his career (like Allegri)
C. We play the emotions card an sign someone respectable, like Rijkaard or Ancelotti (who went unavailable) just based on past ties.
I don't see much space for Hiddink's and van Gaal's landing at Milan in the future. What I would propose is we sign Lippi or Capello on board for a advisory or supervisory role, and bring someone fresh and talented in as head coach. I think Milan needs some reassurance and something of the old charm back. Discarding Capello simply because he hasn't been in club football for a while and is old IMO isn't wise.
Not sure, did they break our unbeaten record or not?
It's not about ageism, not like VG or Hiddink are spring chickens, but it's the type of coach Cappello is, he's too rigid and set in his ways, I don't think it would be a good idea at all to have him on as head coach, and I don't think Lippi is either.
Hiddink accepted the Chelsea bench knowing that he'll most likely be out come summer, so I don't think it would be much of a stretch to think that he'd take on the challenge at Milan. He's a coach with an endless amount of experience in terms of working with more limited teams, I personally think he'd be the perfect kind of coach to lead us out of this rough patch.
Also, I said Spelletti would be a good stepping stone solution, not the solution in and of itself.
And the proposal you're making here about having Fabio and Lippi on in advisory roles is a total different concept to having them as the actual head coach of the side, which I think would be a big mistake.
Also, you're forgetting that there have been other really good coaches available at times when we were looking and we passed them over for the cheaper and easier solutions (like Klopp for example)