Great response, Jack Sparrow. Some comments below.
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Dec 2 2008, 02:06 AM)

You'll have to give alternatives for Seedorf and Pirlo...then we can talk of competition...otherwise you have some good points.
Given the current team, you do need that junction player between the defense and attack, as you mentioned. I would play Seedorf or Pirlo, but only one. Preferably Seedorf, since he is stronger and doesn't lose the ball as much as Pirlo (Pirlo lost the ball wayyy too much vs. Palermo).
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Dec 2 2008, 02:06 AM)

Hypothetically, suppose you buy a player who's going to compete with Seedorf, and Seedorf steps it up. We all know that when Seedorf steps it up few people match up to his class. What then? As per common sense, you continue playing the guy on form- Clarence. So then what? What is the sub there for?
Considering the number of games (e.g. serie a, uefa/cl, coppa italia), the need to change tactics/formations during home/away games vs strong/weak teams, substitutions, and the reality of injuries, you can certainly have 2 solid players competing for each spot. We have three solid DMs (gattuso, ambro, flamini) competing for 2 DM spots, and Emerson still plays.
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Dec 2 2008, 02:06 AM)

I'm not saying there is no point in your argument. But just trying to point a possible flipside. As for Ibra...do you honestly think Mourinho will even consider getting a person to compete with him? Like say a David Villa or someone? Ibra would just hand in a transfer request and Silvio would snap him up. So what Mourinho does is butter him up, and make all those comments about how he should be/will be Ballon d'Or . Different people need to be handled differently.
That is a good point, but there are very few such comparisons. One would be Kaka. I think these people also have a good source of motivation from the media. If they play poorly, they will lose the media spotlight to someone else. No player wants to lose that spotlight. Still, you make a very good point. However, if you had a David Silva, and he was better than Ibra, and you couldn't play them together, you would keep Silva and sell Ibra. I don't think you would be harmed much here.
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Dec 2 2008, 02:06 AM)

Like Ronaldinho. And perhaps like Seedorf, who I do believe has been pretty good this season. Competition for places is one way of getting people to play better, but not the only way, and perhaps in some cases not even the right way.
Agreed, as noted above. However, I think competition is the most important factor for most players.
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Dec 2 2008, 02:06 AM)

It seemed to have worked perhaps for Rino. But this seems to have left Flamini a bit in the dark.
Absolutely. He had been out of form past 2 years. This year he has been stellar, likely for this reason.
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Dec 2 2008, 02:06 AM)

I completely agree with your point about centre backs. Though I feel, just one would do. Kaladze is despite his 'singularities' one of the better Grade: B+ CBs out there. What he needs is a top CB like Nesta at the peak of his powers beside him. I don't think the man has the composure to lead a team out, maybe coz unlike Georgia, he feels he isn't the biggest dog in the yard for Milan.
You may be right about him, but I would only feel comfortable with 1 new CB if Nesta is back to 100%. He would be the starting CB, and Kaladze could fill in during short injuries. But I fear Nesta will not return consistently again. Santacroce/Zapata or Mexes are an ideal pair considering players that "might" be able to be bought soon from their clubs.
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Dec 2 2008, 02:06 AM)

Your argument with Seedorf and Pirlo, while not entirely without merit has the following complications. Seedorf acts as the very crucial 'junction' player. Not a 'water-carrier' like Deschamps, but a creative junction player. There is no one in the current squad who can do that. Yoann(since I know his name will crop up) isn't that. He doesn't have the vision or the complete composure to be that way. He is better off playing in a Stevie Gerrard/ Zidane kind of role. Maybe Moutinho..but I dunno.
I agree. Furthermore he has the strength to not be tackled off the ball. Yoann does not have that, either.
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Dec 2 2008, 02:06 AM)

Pirlo? Are you sure you aren't falling into the trap of thinking a player who doesn't run a million miles or do a dozen stepovers or make last gasp tackles isn't pulling his weight? Pirlo is unique. No one in the world does what he can. One of the most complete mid-fielders in the world namely Seedorf, barely filled in. His current dip in form is coz he's been out for 3 months, and needs to regain match rhythm.
No, no. I hate all that fancy stuff. The issue with Pirlo is this. He is slow and weak, and since he plays in the center in front of poor CBs, he represents a huge threat defensively in a very key position. Therefore, he has to compensate for this risk with some amazing offensive qualities. When he is in form - he is without a doubt invaluable to the team and more than compensates for the defensive risk. However, if he is out of form, our attack is suffocated, and we begin eating goals. Smarter teams have traditionally focused on shutting down Pirlo instead of Kaka. Palermo did so (they didn't have to choose since Kaka was out), and it worked wonders in the first 60 minutes. The Xmas tree was created around Pirlo... and it lived and died by Pirlo's performances. Given Pirlo's poor form and inconsistency, this is now too risky a gamble.
I feel much more comfortable with Seedorf playing in that role (choosing between the lesser of two evils). If Seedorf upped his effort to 100%, he would be a great fit for that role. We have seen glimpses of this in previous games. He might not have the same vision as Pirlo, but he gives up less defensively... and that is important at the moment.