That was absolutely ridiculous... I have never seen something like it before!!


Roma's goal wasn't offside!!

Anyway... I don't think that's the case... we played entirely different... we even scored twice without him. That means something and showed to our players that they shouldn't be waiting for Ricky to cast his spells every time!!

What I'm trying to say is that if Ricky was here then if they had managed to close him down then the game for us would be over as usual cause everyone's depending on him when he's playing. Now that we were forced to play without him alternative attacking options were tried out and wow they worked!!

... I heard that this rule doesn't exist anymore.
And that when it's a hard tackle, red is allowed, but in 9 from 10 it's yellow

Yes it was. I'm talking about their second.

When you're watching the match you don't even noptice it because the TV angles don't show it. But I was watching a program on Milan channel and with their angles you could see that is was off side by at least a metre and a half. X-offender and MANY others would confirm this.



Got it and you're right.

I think everyone get's too dependent on him, just like we were on Sheva before.

Boriello's goal was pretty amazing btw

wow!! why don't we get a vase instead!!

"We won nothing this year" and "We won the Coppa Italia this year" sounds the same to me!! And it is the same for Milan...

Exactly 9 out of 10 times a yellow would have been given. and last time I checked the rule still was that if he was the last man and there is a goal scoring opportunity then it should be red, and that definately wasn't a last man situation and it was far from a goal scoring opportunity

it doesn't exist in the way han described it. The book reads "A red card is shown when a tackle is taken on a player in an evident goal position" not "last man" or anything like that!

Still it was definately not a clear goal scoring opportunity

for dst this is what X-offender said about Roma's second

can't i get what? that you want to pick and choose what we do and don't win!
the coppa italia is mickey mouse that's not in question but to say if we won it we won nothing makes you sound a bit spoilt

well... that cagliari winced in pain really good

Agreed.


I believe in your word han you didn't have to post this!!


I erased the "can't you get it part", I find it offensive myself!!
Well it may be that I'm spoilt but in any case Milan made me so and I honestly feel the way I said above; Coppa Italia really feels like a TIM Cup stature trophy!!

i prefer the mickey mouse seasons a disaster trophy
but sometimes beggers can't be choosers

we already are linked with david suazo...
Cagliari: Suazo `Piaccio al Milan? Fa piacere`
http://it.sports.yahoo.com/03122006...fa-piacere.html

and I'm spoiled enough to be annoyed by this!!

No matter our position on the table or even the league we're in (hell even in Serie Z15) Milan will never be beggers!!

That's why I don't care about the CI in the first place!!

this is lost in translation
it's a saying in england which basically means you can't always have everything
sorry

well then it's either something/everything or nothing... Coppa Italia reflects a figure of the latter!!

Oh please let's stop now, I'm tired!! Coppa Italia or not if we end up with nothing else than than it will be an awful season!!

Well i saw the game in the morning.. and getting used to smoke a pack of cigarretes and drink so early ! , but im quite sad and dissapointed , and well my hopes are all gone , if they don't move on the invernal transfer market for new players, in two months will be also crying when we get smacked from the UCL...

and when that happens.. this will get really messi