[William405]

Hmh, a few more millions and I'd seriously consider this.

Yeah, and they're more than willing to shell out more millions..I'm sure. But, the problem is that it will leave us in a dire situation..since we don't have really much time to fix it.

[X-Offender]

No point in selling him. We'll be getting plenty of $$$ once the Chinese kick in. Selling him would only disrupt things even further.

[Fillipo Simone]

Perhaps you're right.

[maldini03]

IMO it would be horrible to sell Romag now. He is young and one of the most promising defenders around. Great defenders don't come around everyday. Easily the best defender we have had since Nest and Thiago. He is our best foundational player should be entirely unsellable.

[d'Arc.LP]

Hmh, a few more millions and I'd seriously consider this.

How much more ?

[d'Arc.LP]

Milan are in talks with Chelsea for Mario Pasalic. Possible loan. It is OUT from Romagnoli deal. #Sky

Milan have rejected Chelsea's second offer for Romagnoli. They have no intention to sell the player.
[Gazzetta dello Sport].

Galliani met Mauri's agent yesterday, he will leave on loan. Milan wanted to keep him after the injury of Bertolacci, however the player doesn't want to remain on the bench for another season. Bologna and Pescara are interested but not convincing, an option is Empoli, as well as some Spanish clubs. #MN

One of Rodrigo Ely and Jherson Vergara are destined to leave Milan. The colombian is more likely.
[Milan TV]

According to L’Équipe, Benjamin Stambouli met with Milan representatives yesterday in a hotel in Paris after being informed that Schalke 04 had decided not to sign him. Milan have received the go-ahead from PSG to make a formal loan offer.

[Fillipo Simone]

All crumbles and questionable players, but perhaps something unexpectedly (lucky) happens to us.

I'd sell Romagnoli for 50 million, I think we could buy us back Silva or anyone with that kind of money.

[d'Arc.LP]

All crumbles and questionable players, but perhaps something unexpectedly (lucky) happens to us.

I'd sell Romagnoli for 50 million, I think we could buy us back Silva or anyone with that kind of money.

But Romagnoli is young, has lots of potential and we should build our team around him. I wouldnt sell him even for 60 million, not because he is that good right now, but seeing the market and the players right now, I dont know who would we replace him with. Silva is quite old right now and I dont think we can find a young Silva right now.

By the way, according to La Gazzetta dello Sport Milan is looking to return 32 old Aquilani as a quick solution. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)

This post has been edited by d'Arc.LP: Aug 24 2016, 03:09 PM

[Fillipo Simone]

Well, Aquilani is certainly better then some of the mentioned names.

[Fillipo Simone]

Btw., I really think that if we fail to sign Caceres we should be bring back one of Alex or Mexes for a year or at least up until January. Both are without club, both better then most of the short term options we can come up right now.

[d'Arc.LP]

Chelsea have made a €42M offer (which includes bonuses) for Romagnoli. #RMC

Next AC Milan owners (Chinese group) at the moment don't seem convinced to sell Romagnoli. . [Fabrizio Romano-Sky]

Milan TV report that Milan received no bid from Chelsea for Romagnoli till this moment, confirmed Milan's monitoring Mario Pasalic.


It looks to me that we might soon say goodbye to Romagnoli. We will probably then invest 15-20m in a defender and the left on a midfielder. What kind of a defender we can get with 15 - 20 m ?

[Fillipo Simone]

What brings you to that conclusion?

[X-Offender]

It looks to me that we might soon say goodbye to Romagnoli. We will probably then invest 15-20m in a defender and the left on a midfielder. What kind of a defender we can get with 15 - 20 m ?

Strange you think like that, cos every report thus far indicates that we don't want to sell him.

[X-Offender]

Chelsea have yet not made a new offer for Romagnoli, but Fininvest and the Chinese don't want to sell him. /TMW

Milan are about to sign Mario Palisic from Chelsea on loan. /Sky

[han2503]

No point in selling him. We'll be getting plenty of $$$ once the Chinese kick in. Selling him would only disrupt things even further.

This!!

Why would you guys even consider selling Romagnoli for ANY kind of money atm is beyond me. I know we're desperate this summer because we have no budget and can't fix the very obvious problems we have in the midfield but this is exactly the kind of short sighted thinking that got us into the current mess we're in. Going for the quick buck and not thinking how it will effect us in the long run.

Romagnoli should be unsellable, along with a very select few on this team (him, Donnarumma, Calabria and Mattia DS). What kind of message would it be if we caved for such a sh!tty offer? (by today's standard's when Luiz is going for 50m and we have 100m signings happening, Romagnoli is worth more than that). If we caved in to the first half decent offer for one our best players than that shows the true intent of our new owners, which should worry all of us. I don't know why any of you would consider this. Especially when we have such a dire situation at the back with barely a week still to go in the transfer window

All crumbles and questionable players, but perhaps something unexpectedly (lucky) happens to us.

I'd sell Romagnoli for 50 million, I think we could buy us back Silva or anyone with that kind of money.

Silva is getting old and very injury prone. We shut that door when we sold him off for peanuts along with Zlatan. Romagnoli is the future. We should hold on to him and he should be unsellable to this club if the new owners are serious and have the deep pockets that we were told they do than we shouldn't be a selling club any longer but a buying one


Anyone know anything about this Pasalic they're linking us to?