QUOTE (Danny @ Jan 19 2013, 04:21 PM)

God, this is proving really difficult. I meant the second part of the bit I bold highlighted in your statement was the only part I'd implied. The rest I'd not even said. You seem to take pieces of my comments, misunderstand them, then begin a new line of debate I'd not even mentioned.
That said I stand by my comment - Sheva did about as well at Chelski as Kaka has at Real. And I don't want history repeating itself.
That's your entire comment that I quoted.
I don't know where you think the misunderstanding happened... I understood what you were trying to say which you've explained in more detail in the quoted part below. The rest of my post I only wrote about why I think he'd still be useful, which you don't think is the case and why I thought you were being a bit harsh in your assessment. I don't see how you think there was a misunderstanding...
Maybe I am going out of my mind and still can't understand you (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif) Who knows.
But here. I'll give you what you want. I'll conceed in this one. You think that Kaka won't be useful for us, while I do. I agree with you that anyone who expects anywhere near what Kaka was for us in his first spell will be soarely disappointed. And THAT is the point that we can both agree on right?
QUOTE (Danny @ Jan 19 2013, 04:21 PM)

I think you've not quite understood me again. When I called him poor, I meant by HIS standards. He became only good rather than the mercurial son of God he'd previously been. I think 'deteriorated slightly' is generous. I think he lost about 40% of what he was. I also can't agree he was carrying us alone. Mainly because we had guys like Ronaldo and Ronaldinho, the latter of whom recaptured a fair bit of his Barca form with us till it tailed away.
Poor by his standards? Yes, I agree with that.
But he was still crucial for us. Even when he was not at his best. You don't think we were that reliant on him... Meh, he was still usually our top scorer. Even when Ronaldo and later Ronaldinho came in.
QUOTE (Danny @ Jan 19 2013, 04:21 PM)

Problem is debate when someone disagrees with you and seems robust and stubborn with their view feels a bit pointless. It's like talking to a brick wall.
You very rarely ever back down, and that's kinda my issue. I accept your point about standing by your opinion if you hold it importantly, but I'm not totally sure I've ever really seen you back down from anything these past few months. Partial isn't really that accommodating.
As an aside, my entire conversation has been nothing to do with Allegri, why are you bringing him up repeatedly?
I don't get why you're saying this, because you don't agree with me either and I don't expect you to conceed so I can feel better about what I'm saying. People debate all the time and 99% of the time those debates end in "let's agree to disagree". That means neither party is willing to give in on their points unless there is evidence that they are proven wrong.
I'm mentioning Allegri because he's centered around most arguments on here. And not just by me but the majority of the posters. So I'm choosing these areguments as a basis for what I'm saying. My point is, we'll keep seeing these discussions about him as long as he's coaching the team. And unless one party is proven to be wrong for complaining/defending him then none of us can really say whether one is right or wrong in their beliefs about this particular subject. I don't know if you get what I'm trying to say here, but for me this is the crux of the whole issue that we've been discussing