 |

CL - Group Stage Day 6 - Milan - Ajax, Date: 08/12/10 Time: 20:45 CET |
|
|
|
|
Dec 8 2010, 11:49 PM
|
Prima Squadra

Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,655
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109

|
QUOTE (X-Offender @ Dec 8 2010, 11:22 PM)  Even if Seedorf gets injured, Allegri will never play Dinho instead of him. So don't try to imply that Dinho is Seedorf's natural substitute. He's a foreign body to Allegri's plans, and that's why he will leave in January. Technically speaking he is, and if Seedorf does get injured, then what? Play Robinho behind the strikers? Never did and never will work. And allegri obviously doesn't see Pirlo as someone who can play in the AM position for some strange reason (IMG: style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) As for Eboue, mediocre at best, wouldn't go near him with a 10 foot pole
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 8 2010, 11:57 PM
|
The brightest sun is the purest gun
           
Group: Full Members
Posts: 26,848
Joined: 23-June 06
From: Albania
Member No.: 2,008

|
QUOTE (han2503 @ Dec 8 2010, 11:49 PM)  Technically speaking he is, and if Seedorf does get injured, then what? Play Robinho behind the strikers? Never did and never will work. And allegri obviously doesn't see Pirlo as someone who can play in the AM position for some strange reason (IMG: style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) If Seedorf gets injured, then he'll play Boateng. If Boateng gets injured, then he'll play Pirlo. If Pirlo gets injured, then he'll play Robinho. Bottom line is, whether we need a substitute for Seedorf or not doesn't depend at all on Dinho's departure. It depends on the fact that we only have one natural trequartisa, and thus yes, we need another one to have more depth in that position. I repeat, Dinho is no longer in the plans of Allegri, otherwise he wouldn't have let him warm the bench for seven games straight. QUOTE (Locke Lamora @ Dec 8 2010, 11:53 PM)  I hope people here realise that was a joke? Oh... (IMG: style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 8 2010, 11:58 PM
|
Primavera

Group: Moderators
Posts: 18,833
Joined: 5-April 06
From: Croatia, Zagreb
Member No.: 1,564

|
QUOTE (William405 @ Dec 9 2010, 12:23 AM)  I just love the way you seem so sure(assertive),so Mourinholike (IMG: style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif) Hahaha +1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 9 2010, 12:05 AM
|
Prima Squadra

Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,655
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109

|
QUOTE (X-Offender @ Dec 8 2010, 11:57 PM)  If Seedorf gets injured, then he'll play Boateng. If Boateng gets injured, then he'll play Pirlo. If Pirlo gets injured, then he'll play Robinho. Bottom line is, whether we need a substitute for Seedorf or not doesn't depend at all on Dinho's departure. It depends on the fact that we only have one natural trequartisa, and thus yes, we need another one to have more depth in that position. I repeat, Dinho is no longer in the plans of Allegri, otherwise he wouldn't have let him warm the bench for seven games straight. All of those options aside from Pirlo are terrible options at best. Personally I don't want Seedorf playing there, I want Pirlo behind the strikers, Boateng in the midfield, obviously Allegri does not see it that way, Boateng is no AM, doesn't have the touch or vision, basing that theory on the Brescia game would be incredibly naive, since Brescia were just plain pathetic at best, Seedorf cannot play regularly, simple. He's been over worked, suddenly he's tired and his form has dropped. Robinho is not an AM it was tried out and failed, what's the point of it? Dinho goes? No problem, just bring someone in who can actually play the position. Seedorf isn't a real trequartista either, not to mention all the physical limitations he brings to the table. If Allegri was willing to play Pirlo there and let Seedorf be his sub, then I agree with you, Dinho wouldn't be needed but that is not the case. And if Seedorf does get injured and Allegri gets it into his stubborn head that he wants Boateng playing there, then we'll be royally screwed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 9 2010, 12:53 AM
|
The brightest sun is the purest gun
           
Group: Full Members
Posts: 26,848
Joined: 23-June 06
From: Albania
Member No.: 2,008

|
QUOTE (han2503 @ Dec 9 2010, 12:05 AM)  All of those options aside from Pirlo are terrible options at best. Personally I don't want Seedorf playing there, I want Pirlo behind the strikers, Boateng in the midfield, obviously Allegri does not see it that way, Boateng is no AM, doesn't have the touch or vision, basing that theory on the Brescia game would be incredibly naive, since Brescia were just plain pathetic at best, Seedorf cannot play regularly, simple. He's been over worked, suddenly he's tired and his form has dropped. Robinho is not an AM it was tried out and failed, what's the point of it?
Dinho goes? No problem, just bring someone in who can actually play the position. Seedorf isn't a real trequartista either, not to mention all the physical limitations he brings to the table. If Allegri was willing to play Pirlo there and let Seedorf be his sub, then I agree with you, Dinho wouldn't be needed but that is not the case. And if Seedorf does get injured and Allegri gets it into his stubborn head that he wants Boateng playing there, then we'll be royally screwed But han, we are looking for a trequartista. Braida has been visioning Lamela up closely this last week, and Ganso is our primary objective. We just can't bring them right now because of the EU spot argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 9 2010, 02:16 AM
|
Esordienti A 95
    
Group: Full Members
Posts: 976
Joined: 14-March 10
From: Brasil/Chile
Member No.: 7,300

|
8 points out of a possible 18.
Two victories (against Auxerre), two draws (Ajax away, Real at home), two defeats.
(as a by the by, Leo did just one point better, 9 out of 18, with two victories, three draws, and one loss).
Watch us draw Chelsea and get our asses handed to us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 9 2010, 09:30 AM
|
Loves Greek Women esp Fay

Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,924
Joined: 19-May 06
From: Bangalore,India
Member No.: 1,865

|
Well it was a pretty stupid formation to start with. There was no DM. Ambro and Flamini were functioning as semi-wingers, so how the hell were we gonna play the midfield to start with. The only option would have been to play highballs, and with r80 and robinho as forwards it's a hopeless formation. For a coach, his interpretation of the 4-3-1-2 is pretty damn stupid sometimes. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/dry.gif) Inter lost 3-0 with a bunch of kids away!!! We lost 2-0 with pretty much a first team at home. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/dry.gif) Can't believe I wasted all the money at the sports bar!! At least now we know why Rino Gattuso plays so much. Somebody has to get the ball so the mid-field can play! (IMG: style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) And Merkel meh!! I've seen better play from Josh McEachran.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 9 2010, 09:55 AM
|
Allievi Nazionali
        
Group: Helpers
Posts: 8,627
Joined: 19-April 06
Member No.: 1,660

|
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Dec 9 2010, 02:30 AM)  Well it was a pretty stupid formation to start with. There was no DM. Ambro and Flamini were functioning as semi-wingers, so how the hell were we gonna play the midfield to start with. The only option would have been to play highballs, and with r80 and robinho as forwards it's a hopeless formation. For a coach, his interpretation of the 4-3-1-2 is pretty damn stupid sometimes. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/dry.gif) Inter lost 3-0 with a bunch of kids away!!! We lost 2-0 with pretty much a first team at home. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/dry.gif) Can't believe I wasted all the money at the sports bar!! At least now we know why Rino Gattuso plays so much. Somebody has to get the ball so the mid-field can play! (IMG: style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) And Merkel meh!! I've seen better play from Josh McEachran. I (IMG: style_emoticons/default/wub.gif) you
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
 |