QUOTE (Giancarlo @ Aug 23 2008, 04:19 PM)

I don't think we really agree on anything... so I'll just I agree to disagree. I think Pippo will be fine for most of the season. He may be out for a few games, but I'm sure he can play a good 70% of them. We have enough cover for him. We have more than enough depth and I agree with Galliani.
Well I do agree that Pippo's strain is fairly minor. He's been out for the entire pre-season and played something like 73 minutes in all and already he's out again. You might choose to be optimistic and I admire that but, looking at Pippo's age and past history with injuries I'm personally pretty certain that he will be out for 75% of the entire season with little bothersome strains here and there.
Like you said we should agree to disagree on this issue, and personally I hope you are the one in the right because Pippo being fit for 70% of our season would be a
huge boost, but the realist in me can't see him feature for more then MAX 15 games, because of being out through injury. And imo that's a huge blow when that striker is relied upon because there is no other alternative
QUOTE (Giancarlo @ Aug 23 2008, 04:19 PM)

That was a minor injury and nothing major. I'm not saying put all the goal scoring responsibility on his shoulders. I'm saying give the kid a chance.
I'm personally willing to give him more then a chance, Pato has my full support and I would love nothing more then to see him scoring 20+ goals for us this season. But you have to take into account his age and the responsabilities being put onto him. Last season he got more more then one injury, he's a player that will get tackled a lot so you can't really rule out any injuries for certain.
QUOTE (Giancarlo @ Aug 23 2008, 04:19 PM)

He found his stride and I think he's a perfectly capable striker. I think it was wise we gave him another chance... again some would say it was a gamble, but I think it was a good idea.
The whole gamble thing with Ronaldinho I personally agree with you that Ronaldinho, even though some say he is a gamble, a player with that much talent for the price we got him, is not a gamble but a good deal. But Boriello is definately not, I have been personally been against it from day 1, why would we buy a player that just a season ago we were desperate to get rid of and then buy him back again??? Boriello has never done anything good for Milan and it's not like he's never been given the chance in the past. If he proves me wrong then I'm all for it, since him proving me wrong is for the good of the team and I'm all for that. But I just don't see it happening.
QUOTE (Giancarlo @ Aug 23 2008, 04:19 PM)

I totally disagree with you. I think Paloschi has been getting experience quite a bit... he took part in a major tournament for The U-19 Italian national team.
Paloschi is good to have as a back up and I would like to see him getting the games he deserves, but relying on him for the Serie A in case we encounter a major striker shortage? No I don't think it would be a wise decision.
QUOTE (Giancarlo @ Aug 23 2008, 04:19 PM)

I tihnk we are well covered. I'd like one more striker, but as it stands I think we're completely covered in that. And I don't think it will cause any problems either. Remember Ronaldinho can play as a striker (and he often did for Barcelona).
We don't rely on the strikers to score all the goals like other teams. Our midfielders do a lot of that too.
Well Kaka and R10 can both slot in as supporting forwards, but we only have Pippo and Boriello that are pure strikers, so if anything happens to those 2 we have no cover since neither Pato, Kaka or Ronaldinho can play as box strikers, they all like to drop deep.
To rely on our midfield for goals, is a bit of a risk, it depends on what type of form Pirlo, Seedorf and R10 will be in. R10 might also take a bit to get his footing, let's not forget this is a new league to him, one that is very different from La Liga