 |

Seedorf, Clarence Seedorf |
|
|
|
|
Aug 31 2008, 07:01 PM
|
Primavera

Group: Moderators
Posts: 18,833
Joined: 5-April 06
From: Croatia, Zagreb
Member No.: 1,564

|
QUOTE (MizNelson @ Aug 31 2008, 07:16 PM)  Seedorf has no motivation at all and yet is fully aware that Carlo will play him no matter what. That's dangerous. Kaka will come back, you know..?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 31 2008, 07:35 PM
|
Primavera

Group: Moderators
Posts: 18,833
Joined: 5-April 06
From: Croatia, Zagreb
Member No.: 1,564

|
QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Aug 31 2008, 08:27 PM)  I have a feeling Ambro will be dropped, and Seedorf will take his place on the left of the 3 in the 4-3-2-1 formation. No chance,...Carletto loves the double DM team even more then he does Seedorf. Naah,.. But if he puts Seedorf deeper down in midfield, maybe Clarence could do better then. I don't know, I won't judge him based just on the Bologna match. He was bad, but not that bad...I've seen far worse, even from him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 31 2008, 07:53 PM
|
Prima Squadra

Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,655
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109

|
QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ Aug 31 2008, 07:35 PM)  No chance,...Carletto loves the double DM team even more then he does Seedorf. Naah,..
But if he puts Seedorf deeper down in midfield, maybe Clarence could do better then. I don't know, I won't judge him based just on the Bologna match. He was bad, but not that bad...I've seen far worse, even from him. I've always thought he was better when he played there rather then in the attacking mid role. The only really good games I recall Seedorf having in this position were against Man U and Bayern. As I've always said, against these smaller teams that like to defend I would like to see Seedorf in the midfield 3, but against teams like Inter Seedorf should be dropped for a second defensive mid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 31 2008, 08:23 PM
|
Primavera

Group: Moderators
Posts: 18,833
Joined: 5-April 06
From: Croatia, Zagreb
Member No.: 1,564

|
QUOTE (han2503 @ Aug 31 2008, 08:53 PM)  I've always thought he was better when he played there rather then in the attacking mid role. The only really good games I recall Seedorf having in this position were against Man U and Bayern.
As I've always said, against these smaller teams that like to defend I would like to see Seedorf in the midfield 3, but against teams like Inter Seedorf should be dropped for a second defensive mid Exactly. But not against Juve.. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/cool.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 1 2008, 02:25 PM
|
Loves Greek Women esp Fay

Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,924
Joined: 19-May 06
From: Bangalore,India
Member No.: 1,865

|
There's no argument from my side, that Seedorf needs to be in the middle 3. Esp, since we no longer have the old pacy second striker which was Sheva. Pato's good, but has some way to go, before he can fit in that same role. In fact, I'd rather Pato didn't play the Sheva position, but made a brand new niche for himself. Like how Kaka did. He was brought into backup Rui, but his style of play is totally different and we have managed to integrate it.
Anyway back to my point, the fact is there was a difference with Seedorf in the middle 3, since that was when we had Nesta-Maldini in top form as our CB pairing. We also had Nesta-Kaladze, and Kaladze was solid. With our defence so shaky, playing just one destroyer player is a risk, esp against the big teams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 1 2008, 02:47 PM
|
Prima Squadra

Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,655
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109

|
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Sep 1 2008, 01:25 PM)  There's no argument from my side, that Seedorf needs to be in the middle 3. Esp, since we no longer have the old pacy second striker which was Sheva. Pato's good, but has some way to go, before he can fit in that same role. In fact, I'd rather Pato didn't play the Sheva position, but made a brand new niche for himself. Like how Kaka did. He was brought into backup Rui, but his style of play is totally different and we have managed to integrate it.
Anyway back to my point, the fact is there was a difference with Seedorf in the middle 3, since that was when we had Nesta-Maldini in top form as our CB pairing. We also had Nesta-Kaladze, and Kaladze was solid. With our defence so shaky, playing just one destroyer player is a risk, esp against the big teams. Agreed on that, I don't think we should risk that against any of the big teams, but in games against the smaller teams it would be better having Seedorf rather then an extra defensive mid, we saw it yesterday were we still conceed despite playing 2. Our main problem is Kaladze, not the ammount of defensive mids we play imo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 09:19 AM
|
Loves Greek Women esp Fay

Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,924
Joined: 19-May 06
From: Bangalore,India
Member No.: 1,865

|
And Maldini is either too old ((IMG: style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) ) or has just given up on trying to cover for Kaladze.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 11:55 AM
|
Prima Squadra

Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,655
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109

|
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Sep 2 2008, 09:19 AM)  And Maldini is either too old ((IMG: style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) ) or has just given up on trying to cover for Kaladze. Maldini just can't cover for Kaladze any more, he needs to be focused the entire game because if he's caught out position he doesn't have the speed anymore to track back and make the challenge, if this was 5 years ago then Maldini could cover Kaladze with no problem but not anymore. In order for Kaladze to even look half decent he needs to have Nesta next to him constantly holding his hand. And if Carlo does keep starting Kaladze once all of the CBs are fit I'll personally go over to milanello and shoot him
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
 |