|
CL - Group Stage Day 1 - Milan - Auxerre, Date: 15/09/10 Time: 20:45 CET |
|
|
|
Sep 16 2010, 08:00 AM
|
Loves Greek Women esp Fay
Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,924
Joined: 19-May 06
From: Bangalore,India
Member No.: 1,865
|
Didn't see the match...but again we seem to suffer with teams who press high up the pitch. Anyone got any ideas for this?
And please make it nice and practical....and not the Player X is crap routine so we need to spend 190900 million to buy Essien.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 16 2010, 08:05 AM
|
Prima Squadra
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,645
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109
|
QUOTE (alskor @ Sep 16 2010, 12:56 AM) Yup... and not only that, but Mascherano is so good and so disruptive you can put him on an island. He doesn't need any help.
I agree with your general point... but with the age of our midfield and the lack of defensive abilities in our wings we're always going to be very open to a counter attack... and in that light, KPB's athleticism and speed really does help cover for Pirlo. Ambro-Pirlo-Flamini should probably be the first choice, sure... but I don't see KPB as much of a downgrade. I did say before the season that he might be best used as an hour mark sub to inject some life and energy into the midfield. The only combo that I don't think works is Gattuso and Ambro together with Pirlo. Too old, too slow, not enough defensive ability (they're all past their prime in that respect). Ambro-Pirlo-Flamini imo is not a good idea. Flamini is not a box-to-box mid. He's a DM but he can also move the ball forward at pace and shoot. Imo for a really fast midfield, Flamini-Pirlo-Boateng would be the best choice. Seedorf-Pirlo-Flamini would be slower but can hold better possession. Ambro-Pirlo-Seedorf is the slowest combination we have and imo not a good idea anymore. Imo this is how the midfield combination should work Combination 1: Ambro-Pirlo-Boateng:If Ambro is playing, Boateng needs to play as well, he'll inject pace into a rather slow midfield and Ambro can hold his position while Pirlo and Boateng are the only ones tat can push forward, with Boateng being able to recover his position quickly due to his pace if we get caught out. Also he needs to play on Zambrotta's side, like elcordbez said, you can see clearly how Zambro was holding his position when Boateng moved forward, something Bonera was not doing when Rino moved forward against Cesena, thus Pirlo getting caught wide open. And the DM should be on Antonini's side since he likes to power forward more to help Ronnie Combination 2: Seedorf--Pirlo--Flamini:This combination would focus more on keeping possession, while still having some speed in the midfield due to Flamini. Seedorf is a smarter player then Boateng, he knows how to hold his position when Antonini moves forward. Combination 3: Flamini-Pirlo--Boateng:Imo this is our fasest and most dynamic midfield trio. Flamni can cover Pirlo while still help out with moving the ball, Boateng will help out in defense while also providing the burst into the box. Pirlo should be ahead of them in the midfield though so he's more free to roam Combo's that we shouldn't play Ambro-Pirlo-Rino -> Horrible Ambro-Pirlo-Seedorf -> Too slow Ambro-Pirlo-Flamini -> Too one dimensional
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 16 2010, 08:13 AM
|
Esordienti A 95
Group: Full Members
Posts: 651
Joined: 22-August 05
From: Sydney, Australia
Member No.: 251
|
QUOTE (d'Arc.LP @ Sep 16 2010, 09:22 AM) We have the best creative player in the world but he is physically not very good. Of course you have to cover him. Read this for our game against Cesena - http://acmilan.theoffside.com/champions-le...as-counter.htmlIt seams that we haven't see the same game tonight... I read link you posted a few days ago,i think his emphasis was more on the fact that we lacked the speed to match Cesena's counter attacks something which Flamini and Boateng would give us.I don't think there was too much wrong with Gattuso's role vs Cesena just that he couldn't press/retreat quickly enough and our fullbacks were chasing shadows,that didn't help either. And imo our 433 is more akin to Chelsea's than Barca. Boateng just needs fix his positioning in certain situations,from watching the 2nd half again,the Auxerre midfield got behind him a few times but Pirlo mopped up for him once with that sliding tackle (IMG: style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) but i think that's adequate cover for Pirlo,i know it's asking a lot of Pirlo to do the amount of defensive work he's doing now but i think it's necessary for our 433 to work,attacking wise yeh he is very creative but it can get predictable,needs someone like kpb next to him offering a different option if Pirlo gets closed down. The midfield in general was...to borrow the commentators term "sloppy" and static so overall you're probably right Boateng wasn't that good and we're getting ahead of ourselves but he stood out in an average team performance and showed that he has the abilities we need in midfield so i'm hopeful. QUOTE (MizNelson @ Sep 16 2010, 11:44 AM) Meaning what? too early? alright...
This post has been edited by elcordobez: Sep 16 2010, 08:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 16 2010, 08:20 AM
|
Primavera
Group: Helpers
Posts: 18,058
Joined: 9-February 06
Member No.: 1,265
|
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Sep 15 2010, 05:23 PM) No it's just that I was worried some people would assume that I think anyone who's not a creative, crafty genius with vision who can make long/short assists ALONG with running at the speed of light while beating their man with a gazillion tricks is a sub-standard footballer.
You're right though. I'm probably not as big a fan as you are because I kept thinking of him as our new Sheva and expect the same standards, the same style of play. I think he can't be that way, despite my mental conditioning to the #7 shirt. We should accept that his strengths tend to be towards being a primo punta and maybe play him there.
The downside is we might be throwing away any chance of him developing his band of capabilities and turn into a one-dimensional pacy striker. Look at Drogba, he's primarily a frontman, but his contributions recently have become so varied. Can Pato expand on a parallel? Become much more than just a goalscorer? You can't expect 2 players to be the carbon copy of each other. Pato and Sheva have some qualities in common but they're far from similar players. he's not even a #7. at Inter, he wore #11. he's definitely a #11 type of player, so don't let that number 7 fool you! I think I wouldn't be wrong if I said Sheva was a bit slower, had less technique on the ball but was a better finisher, and had a better sense of team work. he was more 'European' while Pato is more Brazilian. but those qualities he lacks can be worked on and improved nonetheless. he can change as he's still pretty young. and this is not the perfect world of FCB... So what Pato really needs IMO is a great (or better yet, genius) coach to decide for him which position suits him best. the rest doesn't worry me cause I believe in his talent. maybe Carlo was right after all, playing Pato at the top of his Christmas tree, as a primo punta... (IMG: style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 16 2010, 08:27 AM
|
Prima Squadra
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,645
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109
|
QUOTE (Zed.D @ Sep 16 2010, 08:20 AM) You can't expect 2 players to be the carbon copy of each other. Pato and Sheva have some qualities in common but they're far from similar players. he's not even a #7. at Inter, he wore #11. he's definitely a #11 type of player, so don't let that number 7 fool you! I think I wouldn't be wrong if I said Sheva was a bit slower, had less technique on the ball but was a better finisher, and had a better sense of team work. he was more 'European' while Pato is more Brazilian. but those qualities he lacks can be worked on and improved nonetheless. he can change as he's still pretty young. and this is not the perfect world of FCB... So what Pato really needs IMO is a great (or better yet, genius) coach to decide for him which position suits him best. the rest doesn't worry me cause I believe in his talent. maybe Carlo was right after all, playing Pato at the top of his Christmas tree, as a primo punta... (IMG: style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif) Imo that position limits Pato to a certain degree. I think his best position is coming in from the left. He knows how to easily beat his man from that left side, while on the right he usually gets stuck. I think when all 3 front players get more accustomed to each other they should all rotate positions continually during the match, they were trying that againt Cesena but were mostly getting in each other's way
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 16 2010, 09:07 AM
|
Loves Greek Women esp Fay
Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,924
Joined: 19-May 06
From: Bangalore,India
Member No.: 1,865
|
I personally think Sheva had more techhnique, probably coz he was a bit more mature in his thought process...like you said more European.
Well yeah...I remember that little debate. When Carlo said in one of his Chelsea interviews on Milan...that he'd considered playing Pato on the right flank but Pato said he wouldn't be comfortable playing there..so the plan was dropped.
But I personally like us switching to a 2-striker system. With Pato playing off Ibra. Both being mobile, it would be hard to manmark.
But fitting either of R80 or Robinho in it is hard then..with both strikers playing central.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 16 2010, 09:16 AM
|
Loves Greek Women esp Fay
Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,924
Joined: 19-May 06
From: Bangalore,India
Member No.: 1,865
|
QUOTE (han2503 @ Sep 16 2010, 12:57 PM) I think when all 3 front players get more accustomed to each other they should all rotate positions continually during the match, they were trying that againt Cesena but were mostly getting in each other's way I didn't watch the last CL match...but I read on some comments from fans that Robinho was doing exactly that when he came on. Popping up on the opposite flank from time to time. Did you guys see it?
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 16 2010, 09:48 AM
|
Prima Squadra
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,645
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109
|
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Sep 16 2010, 09:16 AM) I didn't watch the last CL match...but I read on some comments from fans that Robinho was doing exactly that when he came on. Popping up on the opposite flank from time to time. Did you guys see it? Yep Robinho was more mobile then Pato, who mostly tried to cut inside on his weaker foot, which is when he usually got stuck. Personally I think he can score a lot of goals no matter where he plays, but getting the best out of what he can do aside from scoring is the issue here, and imo that would be playing on the left. But as Zeddie said, Ronnie owns that side and it's not even debatable that he shouldn't be moved. Then again, I do believe Ronaldinho can play behind the 2 strikers, and drift behind them, it's a matter of making it work though As for Sheva, I think he had an overall better footballing mind then Pato, Pato is faster and a better dribbler, while Sheva could cross and make a killer pass as well
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|