  |
 Serie A - Week 2 - Milan - Lazio, Date: 09/09/11 Time: 20:45 CET |
 Sep 13 2011, 01:23 AM
Post
#271
|
|
|
Primavera  Group: Moderators Posts: 18,833 Joined: 5-April 06 From: Croatia, Zagreb Member No.: 1,564  |
That scale does not make any sense. I mean, Brocchi would have been a 10 most of the time because he tried, wouldn't he?
My expectations for Antonini are that he will hold his side in order and accomplish to cut-off or reduce the pressure from the opponents side. Did he do that? NO. Did we concede 2 goals from our left? YES. Were those 2 goals isolated incidents? NO. How can we rate Antonini positive then? I agree, Nesta was far from perfect, but that's not the point. |
 |
 
|
|
Sep 13 2011, 10:48 AM
Post
#272
|
|
|
Prima Squadra Group: Moderators Posts: 39,640 Joined: 6-January 06 From: Malta Member No.: 1,109 |
QUOTE (Dracoris @ Sep 12 2011, 10:18 PM)  Lets looks at the expectations for Antonini and Nesta on a rating scale of 1-10. Antonini: 1 Nesta: 10 Antonini, while not perfect, played above expectation, Nesta did not. Thus one receives praise and the other not so much. Based on that scale Antonini had a pretty solid game. What?? That really doesn't make any sense, so if I expect nothing spectacular from Antonini, should that make me happy that he ran his @ss off without any thought or purpose but f@cked up when it really mattered? I don't think so. If that were the case then we should be happy with Bonera, Gattuso, etc, simply because they tried and we shouldn't expect a certain amount from them... |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 10:58 AM |
