QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ Sep 5 2011, 10:17 PM)

Naah, Ambro is simply better. It may be just a pre-season unfitness. But we'll see soon enough.
Better then Flamini? Maybe 5 years ago, but definately not now, no matter how many fouls Flamini commits.
Ambro atm, is better then Rino, yes, but really. Does that say a lot at this point when Rino is dropping to the Bonera, Oddo list of our worst players?
Imo, both should have retired last season as winners.
QUOTE (X-Offender @ Sep 5 2011, 11:16 PM)

Honestly, I don't remember Ambro being so reckless and hacking people down.
There were 2 friendlies where I clearly remember even his biggest backers saying, "OMG, get him off!! What is he doing!!!?"
I'll go through the pre-season match thread to see which friendlies they were
QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ Sep 5 2011, 11:23 PM)

Han's a fan, he knows better for sure

You know it!!!

QUOTE (X-Offender @ Sep 6 2011, 03:54 AM)

I think Ambro has, is and will always be better than Flamini. However, at 34, I would like to see him only played as anchor, the position Van Bommel currently occupies. He doesn't have what it takes anymore to be used as box-to-box mid. That's why I said he should only be used as Van Bommel's substitute.
Not currently, and imo they're completely different players, I'd catagorize Flamini as a Rino type DM more then Ambro. They really have nothing to do with each other as Ambro should only play the holding role when VB is injured or rested while Flamini should contest for the right side with Nocerino and Rino
And did he ever really have what it takes to play as box-to-box? I remember the head slap moments he used to have when he played that under Carlo