|
Van Ginkel, Marco van Ginkel |
|
|
|
Sep 25 2014, 02:26 PM
|
Loves Greek Women esp Fay
Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,924
Joined: 19-May 06
From: Bangalore,India
Member No.: 1,865
|
Tbh, concerned that Lopez is out too. Doesn't give our defence any time to settle. Abbiati continues to play as Gk for us, and deep lying playmaker for the opposition. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 25 2014, 05:26 PM
|
Prima Squadra
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,640
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109
|
QUOTE (Danny @ Sep 25 2014, 03:26 PM) Looked like it took him all of 2 minutes on the pitch to settle in.
Has the tools to make it to the top of the game. Too bad we have no option on him, it really does feel like we're developing Chelsea's talent with this bright move from Galliani
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2014, 04:45 PM
|
Smoking Bianco
Group: Helpers
Posts: 14,039
Joined: 15-August 05
From: KWT
Member No.: 191
|
QUOTE Van Ginkel agent warns Milan
The agent of Marko van Ginkel has warned Milan that his client expects more playing time - or the Rossoneri risk losing him in January.
Van Ginkel joined the club on loan from Chelsea in the summer, but has only seen 33 minutes of Serie A action so far.
It is a situation that has the midfielder’s agent warning that he could return to Stamford Bridge if things don’t change.
“At the start of the season being on the bench was understandable,” Karel Jansen has told Fox Sports.
“There was a need for a period of acclimatisation.
“But now Marko still can’t get a game and we’re not happy.
“He didn’t come to Milan to sit on the bench, that would be illogical.
“If the situation doesn’t change, Chelsea could recall him as early as January.” If anything, this confirms his exit in January. Thought there was huge potential in the kid, except he was never really a part of the playing squad. Same can be said of Niang. Maybe the kid has something to offer, but then again maybe he does not. I wouldn't dwell much into it, seeing as if he was that good, we would have seen more of him.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2014, 06:33 PM
|
Prima Squadra
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,640
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109
|
It's such a shame to see us wasting this opportunity with him
Had we given him proper time he could have flourished, and who knows, he might have pushed for a permanent move, because as kurt said above, there's simply no space for him at Chelsea.
But who cares, let's send him back, as long as there's space for Muntari in the team all is well
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2014, 11:13 PM
|
Prima Squadra
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,640
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109
|
QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Nov 5 2014, 10:56 PM) We could potentially burn bridges with Chelsea over this too. Why would they send any other players on loan here in the future? Yep, especially after the favours they did for us this summer My question is why even bother with the loan if the coach had no intention of using him?
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|