|
Summer Transfers 2014 |
|
|
|
Jul 27 2014, 11:30 PM
|
Prima Squadra
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,640
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109
|
QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Jul 27 2014, 11:27 PM) When all this FFP kicked up, there was meant to be a rule about the amount of money you could make via sponsors as well, to stop a rich owner just using another company of his to sponsor his club for silly money. "Fair value" it was called, I believe. But Barca went way and beyond that and everyone turned a blind eye to it, now United have done the same and it's being ignored again.
FFP means absolutely nothing to a rich club. It's all about creating a glass ceiling to keep certain clubs at the top. Yep, and it's not like Silvio can't do that either had he really wanted to find a loop hole into FFP as well. He's got various companies that could "sponsor" Milan. But as I said, why would he do that when it's obvious he doesn't want to spend money and FFP provides a very convenient excuse to do so.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 28 2014, 12:48 AM
|
Allievi Nazionali
Group: Full Members
Posts: 9,420
Joined: 14-August 09
Member No.: 6,730
|
QUOTE (Rossoneri7 @ Jul 27 2014, 10:43 PM) Exactly (IMG: style_emoticons/default/innocent.gif) Present me with facts you did, Silvio unwilling to fund the FFP loopholes (IMG: style_emoticons/default/king.gif) Who ever heard of the three month monitoring period and all that crap FFP is about (IMG: style_emoticons/default/96.gif) You've trolled this entire thread! In fact you've been trolling for over a year. First we're building a youth project now FFP is sincere and holding us back! You change your trolls dependent on circumstance and demand 'facts' as a way of covering your own complete lack of argument.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 28 2014, 08:55 AM
|
Primavera
Group: Moderators
Posts: 18,833
Joined: 5-April 06
From: Croatia, Zagreb
Member No.: 1,564
|
QUOTE (Rossoneri7 @ Jul 28 2014, 10:02 AM) Milan's adidas deal is 20M per year for ten years.
United's adidas deal is 100M per year for ten years.
There is a GULF of a difference between our market value and that of the top clubs around.
And yeah I demand facts, I have yet to be presented with the same. So why didn't Milan find a way to a better market position? Or do you think it would have been impossible.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 28 2014, 10:06 AM
|
Primavera
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23,206
Joined: 20-November 05
From: Athens, Hellas
Member No.: 911
|
QUOTE (Rossoneri7 @ Jul 28 2014, 10:02 AM) Milan's adidas deal is 20M per year for ten years.
United's adidas deal is 100M per year for ten years.
There is a GULF of a difference between our market value and that of the top clubs around.
And yeah I demand facts, I have yet to be presented with the same. That's one fifth... but we're not even spending one tenth of what United do.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 28 2014, 01:35 PM
|
Smoking Bianco
Group: Helpers
Posts: 14,039
Joined: 15-August 05
From: KWT
Member No.: 191
|
QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ Jul 28 2014, 11:55 AM) So why didn't Milan find a way to a better market position? Or do you think it would have been impossible. It is simply because United have a far greater reach than Milan, this due simply by the 'fame' the club has. For example United is a household name, hence they can negotiate for better deals whether with Nike or Adidas. While Milan have a marginal influence in comparison. We all love Milan, and want it to be on a par with all the others. Its convenient to just say Berlusconi is the reason, but is it really? Or is it just the coincidence that the club 'naturally' is not supposed to be considered a top club? We all like to think by default Milan is the best simply because we have 7 CL titles and a rich history? Does that suffice? QUOTE (dst @ Jul 28 2014, 01:06 PM) That's one fifth... but we're not even spending one tenth of what United do. But then United have greater Revenue than we do, they have sold out (their own) stadium all-round the season, they have strong demand for TV viewings, they have lesser tax expenses to name a few. We would be doing injustice to Milan if we compare the two. Hence why we can not spend one tenth of what United, Chelsea or even Liverpool spend.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 28 2014, 01:37 PM
|
Prima Squadra
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,640
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109
|
QUOTE (Rossoneri7 @ Jul 28 2014, 08:02 AM) Milan's adidas deal is 20M per year for ten years.
United's adidas deal is 100M per year for ten years.
There is a GULF of a difference between our market value and that of the top clubs around.
And yeah I demand facts, I have yet to be presented with the same. Aren't United a Nike team? (IMG: style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|