QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Jan 22 2009, 09:05 AM)

Top of my head- Crespo(21-22 yrs), Pirlo(22-23 yrs) and Pato (19 yrs) (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
O.K you can scratch Pato off the list if you want.
Crespo was at Parma, when you're at that kind of club you really can't pick and choose. And Crespo was already pretty established at the time even though he was young.
Pirlo was only a flop at Inter he had already beun playing the DM role at Brescia when there was Baggio. He was a very highly regarded young Italian player that went to Inter, where they always have 2 big players for each position, so it would be obvious he would fail there playing in attacking mid position, the same thing happened to Seedorf there and he was already a big player that won 2 CL. Sure Carlo gave him another chance playing in the position he's most comfortable in. But at that time Milan was being rebuilt, Carlo's Milan was being built, Nesta, Pirlo, Seedorf, Rui, Pippo, all these players were either brought in the season Carlo came or the season before that so all were relatively new faces.
And Pato is a different thing all together, Milan paid big money (for a 19 year old who had only played a handful of time in Brazil) for him, Carlo couldn't not play him. We also were bare in the striking department, Gila was shooting blanks, Pippo and Ronaldo were both always injured. Had the situations been different like for example Sheva was still there scoring goals, and Gila also, Pato wouldn't have gotten a look in. He barely got a look in last season when Pippo was fit.
QUOTE (Rossoneri7 @ Jan 22 2009, 12:25 PM)

Well okay .. You don't need me to convince you otherwise, but when Carlo brought Zambrotta in from Bari, he applied the same meathod, he made a left fullback play on the right. And Zambrotta was just reaching recognition at the time, and today can play equally well both at right back and left back.
I can see the same meathod being applied to Antonini ... Is it ridiculous ? I don't think so, cuz there might be something behind the curtains, Antonini could very well turn out to be a great option both for the left back slot and right back.
As of now, the player has been doing better on the left, but with time you never know (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Antoni has a really weak right foot, every cross he makes is either over hit or under hit, he makes defensive mistakes that he doesn't do on the left when he's playing on the right. Zambrotta, really established himself as a left fullback under Lippi. And I think he's equally good on both sides, it's not Zambro that bothers me playing on his weak side, it's Antonini, he's 50% less effective on that side.
There is no justifying this decision, you have a fullback that is good on both sides, but one is not on his weak side, so why play him there???
I know sometimes it's more of a forced choice on Carlo because of the brilliant idea we had to loan Oddo, but when both Zambro and Antonini are playing there is no reason why Carlo should play them in their weaker positions.