[Fillipo Simone]

So, MOM undoubtedly Balotelli. Ibra found his heir, at least in terms of confidence, coolness and (I'm sure) Allegri's dependency.

I'm yet to see how SES will react. Niang seemed to fit in, but SES was disjoint with our attack. Hopefully he'll find the needed chemistry.

Flop must be decided between Niang and Bonera. Since Niang is younger and still inexperienced, I've picked Bonera who made terrible mistakes and seemed clueless form time to time. No positioning, no pace, no anticipatory ability. But Niang did pretty bad as well. His poor passing and lack of precision wasted one to many attack in my book.

Flamini is doing very good I have to say. He's proven to be our starter I think. Nocerino did good as well, just like the rest of the usual suspects.

Montolivo...well..his passing and rhythm is okay or good. But he's making way too many mistakes per game and also is awfully useless when it comes to taking shots and making the final pass. To think Allegri and Galliani threw away Pirlo after forcing him to play on the side, then claiming we've "changed the system" and Pirlo isn't needed, just to pull back and reinvent the Pirlo-position for Montolivo - who is inferior in every possible way - is just laughable. I know, it's like a broken record, but I can't get behind that move.

[X-Offender]

MOM - Balo.
Flop - Niang.
Allegri - GTFO!

[TriniKing_CE]

Flop - Niang.

Absolute madness!!

Niang had moments where he displayed great things, and I admit he also had a couple wtf moments, but in the overall scheme of things he was one of the better players. Our attack (which btw was our strong point throughout the game), was partly influenced by him.

Constant while playing well, also had wtf moments and in doing so almost led to us conceding. Bonera left us open at the back and f<vked up all our good work prior. Why not him? I'm just trying to understand the logic here? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif)

[X-Offender]

Absolute madness!!

Niang had moments where he displayed great things, and I admit he also had a couple wtf moments, but in the overall scheme of things he was one of the better players. Our attack (which btw was our strong point throughout the game), was partly influenced by him.

Constant while playing well, also had wtf moments and in doing so almost led to us conceding. Bonera left us open at the back and f<vked up all our good work prior. Why not him? I'm just trying to understand the logic here? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif)

Why? He made very bad decisions throughout the game, his passing is inaccurate, and he wasted two blatant scoring opportunities. Maybe I'm being a bit harsh, but I can't fathom him on the wing.

[TriniKing_CE]

Why? He made very bad decisions throughout the game, his passing is inaccurate, and he wasted two blatant scoring opportunities. Maybe I'm being a bit harsh, but I can't fathom him on the wing.

Fair enough, although I do still find the criticism 'very' (not a bit) harsh. As the kid had his best game yet (with us).

I am sure all the newspapers and critics would agreed the kid played better than he did worse.

But it's fine to have you own opinion (...and I mean this without disrespect or sarcasm, because I know people analyze things differently and that is fine)

I asked you why and you were able to give valid reasons; I just see it differently that's all.

This post has been edited by TriniKing_CE: Feb 3 2013, 11:41 PM