QUOTE (han2503 @ Oct 27 2010, 07:31 PM)

Zlatan needs to score goals, he's not an AM, yes he can create, but not in the way an AM can, he's more of a quick pass player when the opportunity comes along. As for Robinho, you can write it down which ever way you want, but ultimately we will see a trident on the pitch, thus pushing Pato to the right wing, which imo is ridiculous and a complete waste.
If there is one player who needs to score goals it's Pato, followed by Ibrahimovic - so the latter can/should do more than just being the CF. We should not have two CF's who are just there to score goals. Pato is our greatest goalscoring threat, and Zlatan can do a whole lot more for our team so why not using his other benefits also?
Why Pato on the right wing? I put him as LCF. Robinho can go to both wings. At least it's what I want to see, not saying it will happen, that's why I agreed with you I want some tactical changes. I want a tactic where Pato is most as CF.
QUOTE
As for the movement part you talk about. The movement has to come mostly from the midfield 3 which is why I'd want a Flamini, Boateng duo covering Pirlo, a game is won in midfield so having that strong 3 in the middle will give us a big advantage, now if Dinho is playing in front of them it will be more compact, and we'll have creativity through the center, while if Robinho plays we'll have more width, imo both are great options to habve, just don't agree with X-off that the one with Robinho should be used in the big games. It all depends on the way we want to play, imo if you want to win the midfield battle and keep possession then the Dinho option would be the most ideal, while the one with Robs is quicker.
Both are great options, I agree. But how can you disagree with the bold part? How more evidence you want to see that Ronaldinho rocks against weaker sides, and sucks against stronger sides? Against the top sides it should be a no brainer for Robinho.
QUOTE (han2503 @ Oct 27 2010, 07:46 PM)

It's not because he did well last season!! Read my above post.
This one wasn't referred to you. (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
This post has been edited by CHU-LIP: Oct 27 2010, 07:03 PM