QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Aug 30 2008, 11:36 PM)

This sums up the article for me.
They spend the whole article saying "England always says this about Italy, blah, blah. and doesn't hide it's problems" then aims it's finger at England for footballing violence? As if violence never happens in Italy. Hypocrisy at it's finest.
Whoever wrote this is as bad as the English media that leballed Italy a retirement home. They're just as bad as each other. Neither league is "better", neither league is "worse".
Very true kurt, it's 2 different styles of football, that connot be commpared, some people like to watch the fast paced EPL some like to watch the tactical but relitavley slow Serie A, everyone is entitled to having his own taste. personally I like watching both but for me it gets harder to watch in both leagues once going beyond the top 4, maybe Fiorentina in Italy and a bit Spurs in England (no offense (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif) ). No one will watch Wigan or Lecce just for the fun of watching it imo, no matter what anyone says about their own respective leagues
England right now is at the top imo, not because of quality of football and star players but in terms of money being pumped into the league. It's a cycle, first it was the Italians, then the Spanish and now it's Englands turn.
But imo, the situation in England is more precarious because of all these foreign owners and depths that the clubs have. Chelsea, Man U, Arsenal, Liverpool and some other teams that are not in the top 4 are all in staggering ammounts of depth. One bad season or an owner like Abramovic deciding to pull out and a club could end up being sent into the abyss.
This post has been edited by han2503: Aug 31 2008, 12:00 AM