 |

Ronaldo Redux? |
|
|
|
|
Dec 7 2008, 01:02 AM
|
Token Girl

Group: Moderators
Posts: 12,435
Joined: 13-November 06
From: Washington, DC
Member No.: 2,800

|
Should Milan re-sign Ronaldo in the January transfer window?
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Pages
1 2 3 >
|
 |
|
|
Dec 7 2008, 03:27 AM
|
CrAzY EyeS
       
Group: Helpers
Posts: 5,334
Joined: 25-February 08
From: Trinidad
Member No.: 3,723

|
Well then I guess i should be 'shot' (IMG: style_emoticons/default/huh.gif) (IMG: style_emoticons/default/blink.gif) Sry, but imo if he is fit enough to pass a physical exam, then there is no reason we shouldn't re-sign him. Unless his wages are extremely astronomical in which case I am sure something can be worked out. So he is likely to be unfit, or not 100% at times, that doesn't change the man that we're talking about here. This is R9 Ronaldo, not CR7, he can produce 'magic' even when not fully fit. [You Know it, and I know it!] And should it not work out, oh well (won't be the worse thing we have ever done); we have many other forwards to fall back on atm. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 7 2008, 04:00 AM
|
Pulcini Provinciali 98
 
Group: Full Members
Posts: 77
Joined: 4-December 08
Member No.: 6,044

|
QUOTE (TriniKing_CE @ Dec 7 2008, 02:27 AM)  Well then I guess i should be 'shot' (IMG: style_emoticons/default/huh.gif) (IMG: style_emoticons/default/blink.gif) Sry, but imo if he is fit enough to pass a physical exam, then there is no reason we shouldn't re-sign him. Unless his wages are extremely astronomical in which case I am sure something can be worked out. So he is likely to be unfit, or not 100% at times, that doesn't change the man that we're talking about here. This is R9 Ronaldo, not CR7, he can produce 'magic' even when not fully fit. [You Know it, and I know it!] And should it not work out, oh well (won't be the worse thing we have ever done); we have many other forwards to fall back on atm. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Passing a medical means nothing with him. He can't stay fit for long enough. He was at the club for around a year-and-a-half, and made 20 league appearances, which is frankly disgusting. We have to get out of this mentality of signing any old big-name just because they're available. We've suffered with Emerson, Ronaldo himself, and probably Beckham later in the year. We have to rebuild the squad, and it needs to be taken seriously by signing players who are viable options for Ancelotti to play when needed, and who will offer something to the team for years to come. Not players who will either be injured, or unfit when he requires them, or too old to offer anything to the club 4-5 years down the line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 7 2008, 04:42 AM
|
Loves Greek Women esp Fay

Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,924
Joined: 19-May 06
From: Bangalore,India
Member No.: 1,865

|
If we are signing him back, I won't pull my hair out. Since non-performance is not anything I can accuse him of. But he must be paid on a matches played basis. But for the record,I don't think it will happen. I think the board has given up on him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 7 2008, 10:56 AM
|
Insert cool title here<--

Group: Moderators
Posts: 4,121
Joined: 7-May 06
From: Berlin, Germany
Member No.: 1,792

|
QUOTE (vnata001 @ Dec 7 2008, 09:40 AM)  i like the idea of ronaldo phenomeno returning to us..a shevchenko-ronaldo front line would be pretty damn cool.
But ronaldo, pato, borriello, shevchenko, inzaghi is a bit too much. As it is we insist on playing christmas tree, and using only one striker..so we'd have WAY too many strikers riding the bench.. No...it would be pretty damn useless. Signing Emile Heskey would be a better choice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 7 2008, 11:01 PM
|
Primavera

Group: Moderators
Posts: 18,833
Joined: 5-April 06
From: Croatia, Zagreb
Member No.: 1,564

|
Sentiments say YES. Reason says NO. Guess what rules?
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
 |