I see the situation in a different way, it is for the future of Milan. We like to think of the short-run, while these guys have been at it for so long, they have seen all the highs and lows, they have the benefit of the doubt in my books. Not cause they cant do no wrong, but because they have more experience than any of us
On March 4th 2008, Berlusconi declared that he wanted Milan to be operated just like Arsenal. The only top-flight club that has a healthy financial situation. This ‘Arsenal’ model is the target B&G (in addition to Milan board members), and the strategy to achieve that is to rebuilding Milan to be more efficient.
Zlatan and Silva were offered higher salaries by PSG than what they currently earn, hence why is it B&G’s fault? If anything, they made the most out of it – 65MM is not a joke, especially in our clubs situation.
We cant make sense of it all till Aug 31 … Moreover, we cant afford what Silva and Zlatan are worth post the offer (had we refused the offer, we’d have to increase their wages to the new threshold).
A sound judgment for the long-term, for the future of this club to start off under the FFP and start earning a profit. Which inevitably would make Milan one of the first clubs to achieve such a feat. Zlatan will be 31 and Silva 29, in the coming season. We have lost more influential players in Maldini, Shevchenko, Kaka, in recent years and we were still regarded as a top club, not a joke.
Merda sold Etoo to Russia, for astronomical economic situations. Ronaldo left United for Madrid. The problem here is not the club, it is the significant offer that changes everything.
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Jul 13 2012, 12:47 PM)

Not yet. For the money we are getting, we can plug in vital holes which would reduce the impact on weakening our centre back line.
Thats the most rational comment I read since the developments started of a 65MM deal (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/king.gif)