We'll lose some peanuts... earn some peanuts... who cares? Oh wait, we treasure these now!

Its funny because he was our player and we are losing money over a stupid co own bs deal (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

This post has been edited by Bluesummers: Jun 25 2009, 10:29 AM

its important i mean it all adds up but we have nothign to worry about. We have another 70 left probably to spend.

Thiago silva
Abate
Di gennaro
Dzeko
Ciskho



All under 25, i guess Galliani wasn't joking when he said milan are going to become youger.

I think were playing 4-3-3 forsure next season. I mean abate and gennaro back...? THey both can play wing and then we go after a striker who can also play wide.

70m? The money from Kaka's sale? I'm quite sure we did not choose to sell him so that we spend this money elsewhere...

You forget the regular 40 million from champions league (IMG:style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)

This post has been edited by Bluesummers: Jun 25 2009, 10:36 AM

+1.

You don't sell someone to cover losses..and then go and spend all that money elsewhere.

We had about 60 million in losses right? Okay we can solve this problem in multiple ways.


We can use silvio's pocket, which is imo the best way but not a realistic choice. We have been doing this for about 20 years and it has to stop sometime.

We can sell gattuso, pirlo, kaladze, seedorf, dida etc. until the 60 million is covered.

We can sell Kaka and cover the losses.

We can use the money that is is used in place of our transfer fund, which is recieved heavily from champions league participation to cover the losses. Then we could no longer buy any players this summer.



I think the logical choice is the current one, which the mangement took.

This post has been edited by Bluesummers: Jun 25 2009, 10:43 AM

I agree with you. I already said this. That if instead of Kaka, someone had come up and offered 70 million for Pirlo, they would have sold Pirlo.

But all I'm saying is your math seems to indicate that we have another 70 million available to be put into transfers...when we might at the most have another 30.

Another co-ownership deal that's punched us in the face. We'll probably end up bidding a stupid amount to get the player, or we'll lose out because we're cheap. Either way we're stupid.

No we have about 70 million to spend, that i'm quite sure of. It makes sense because Kaka's sale was to make sure leo had the funds to rebuild the team.


But we'll see how its spent. We have quite a few freindlies, which will earn us crazy revenue.


But lets not forget what we've spent.

10 on thiago silva
3-5 on abate
3-5 on gennaro (if we win)
10-15 on cissko
20-30 on dzeko


In reality yes we might not have that much more to spend. But I think we'll spend over a 100 million with the sale of some players ofcourse or silvio's pocket or revenue from friendlies. We will sign 7-8 players, that i'm sure of. Galliani usually pulls of 2-3 signings in august. He is almost known for it (IMG:style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)

This post has been edited by Bluesummers: Jun 25 2009, 11:09 AM

And what happens to Pato?

IMO Di Gennaro is not that good to make it as a regular winger (or a regular player in any position for that matter) at Milan.

Pato ---- Dzeko ---- Rossi (or Abate) for me if we're going to play 4-3-3



I wouldn't be so sure of that...

This post has been edited by Zed.D: Jun 25 2009, 11:10 AM

+1 exactly.

No my dear friend. Dzeko will not play center. He will play wide. It will be ronaldinho=pato=dzeko. For wolfsburg he would always play as a wing/central striker. Its a weird role. Forget Rossi, he will not leave villareal he will sign a new contract with them shortly.

Well I mean you can replace them with Mr. X. We will sign a striker and a full back forsure. Cisskho and dzeko are just who we are linked with right now thats why I put them there.