|
New coach could be decided on Monday |
|
|
|
May 25 2009, 12:05 PM
|
Prima Squadra
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,640
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109
|
QUOTE (Zed.D @ May 25 2009, 11:42 AM) I think it's more than a rumor. looks like it's all done and dusted. Hopefully not. Leonardo would only be good for an interim role. But not as a permanent solution. I only want to hear of 3 coaches the management are interested in -Spalletti -Rijkaard -Prandelli All the others mentioned are either not good enough, or not experianced enough. I really hope that the management don't make a bad decision when it comes to choosing the coach, making a bad transfer decision when it comes to buying a player is one thing, but when it comes to the coaching decision it will really decide how the season turns out. I personally would like to see what Leonardo could do, I think he has all the right characteristics to be a great coach but has no experiance, it would be better if he would go to a smaller Serie A side before taking over at Milan
|
|
|
|
|
May 25 2009, 01:14 PM
|
Primavera
Group: Moderators
Posts: 18,833
Joined: 5-April 06
From: Croatia, Zagreb
Member No.: 1,564
|
IMO there is no good solution or a deal our management could do that would please us or ensure us. Trapattoni, Lippi and Capello, managers who's class is proven and I think would be up to the test are all unavaible. After 2010 this situation could change.
Spalletti and Prandelli are good - one of them could join Juve (if not Conte or Ferrara as permanent), the other (CP) will most likely stay for at least one more season. Both still did not do anything that sensational; Spalletti's Roma was good, but never had the strenght nor that special "fingerspitzengefühl" - and they both never played for Milan which still is a minus to me.
Frank Rijkaard is something in between - he had his up's with Holland and especially Barcelona, he won the CL which isn't that easy to do; he also had bad periods with dutch teams, but never like MvB with ambitious and strong teams.
Then we have a bunch of homies, like Leonardo, Galli, Tassotti, Costacurta, etc. From those I'd pick Tassotti because I know he's a specialist for defensive training and he'd sure make some adjustments in that field. On the other hand, he's already here with us, so one could ask, why didn't he implement those same adjustments sooner? I don't think Ancelotti is that kind of manager who rejects ideas from his assistants.
I'd also consider Franco Baresi for sentimental reasons, because he's our past captain and symbol, and since we've lost Milan's God, Paolo (who never would manage Milan as coach), he could be a nice add for the new transitive generation, just till the new signings improve and settle while Kaka, Pirlo and co. settle finally as "veteran status players".
|
|
|
|
|
May 25 2009, 11:04 PM
|
Primavera
Group: Moderators
Posts: 18,833
Joined: 5-April 06
From: Croatia, Zagreb
Member No.: 1,564
|
I'm not a fan of coach-conglomerates or such like solutions. We need a extra motivator. Tassotti and Galli sure cannot do that; if Leonardo can...maybe, but very questionable. After such a professional like Ancelotti, Leonardo will really be a major set-back.
|
|
|
|
Guest_Suhail 3_*
|
May 25 2009, 11:19 PM
|
Guests
|
Carlo did say i want to stay but i think that was just to keep the players chins and heads up high for the last few games the rumour mill is too strong and ive been waiting and expecting him to exit and confirm hes leaving for a while now carlo is history in my opinion come end of the season (IMG: style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) in no way is that disrespect hes won us every trophy (IMG: style_emoticons/default/cool.gif) we wanted but i think its just time for a change 10 years later
|
|
|
|
|
May 25 2009, 11:21 PM
|
Primavera
Group: Moderators
Posts: 18,833
Joined: 5-April 06
From: Croatia, Zagreb
Member No.: 1,564
|
Saying professional I did mean every aspect, not just the motivation. And yes, maybe Carlo fails to motivate them now. But he did succeed to find a motivation line longer then most of the other coaches I watched on such a high-level, with the same/very similar team selection. I doubt Leonardo will have longer motivation power for a few matches - that's why he's an interim solution, not a serious deal.
|
|
|
|
|
May 26 2009, 08:51 AM
|
Primavera
Group: Helpers
Posts: 18,058
Joined: 9-February 06
Member No.: 1,265
|
(IMG: style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Good point Hasan! =-=-= QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ May 26 2009, 01:51 AM) Saying professional I did mean every aspect, not just the motivation. And yes, maybe Carlo fails to motivate them now. But he did succeed to find a motivation line longer then most of the other coaches I watched on such a high-level, with the same/very similar team selection. I doubt Leonardo will have longer motivation power for a few matches - that's why he's an interim solution, not a serious deal. I thought you were specifically talking about motivation. I agree Carlo possessed all those qualities, but I also think as time passed by he lost some of it, especially the ability to motivate them champions for Regginas and Lecces games... we badly struggled against these two teams, who are in Serie B now, both in the first and the second round of the season. some say we didn't have everyone available, I say we had more than enough quality to beat such teams, only lacked the motivation to do it...
This post has been edited by Zed.D: May 26 2009, 08:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|
May 26 2009, 11:09 PM
|
Primavera
Group: Moderators
Posts: 18,833
Joined: 5-April 06
From: Croatia, Zagreb
Member No.: 1,564
|
...the motivation problem is bigger then Carlo. I'm in a point were I dare saying that it's possible we never will solve this problem; the Maldini game is one example. Just the sole match should have been enough, with or without "the idiot" Carlo to be motivated 100%. But again - NO!
|
|
|
|
|
May 27 2009, 12:15 AM
|
Giovanissimi Nazionali
Group: Full Members
Posts: 3,799
Joined: 17-February 09
From: Montreal
Member No.: 6,245
|
QUOTE Report: Andriy Shevchenko Mediated Carlo Ancelotti’s Move To Chelsea ‘Sheva’ has done precious little to help Ancelotti’s cause this season, however, the Ukrainian was instrumental in brokering the coach’s switch to the Premier League.
Andriy Shevchenko may have been a flop on the football field with Milan this season, but it seems he could find employment in his life after football as a translator. La Gazzetta dello Sport claims he played a crucial role as a mediator in the meetings between Rossoneri coach Carlo Ancelotti and Chelsea supremo Roman Abramovich Ancelotti remains hotly linked to the Premier League outfit and the 49-year-old is widely expected to bring the curtain down on his Rossoneri career next weekend, regardless of the result of a crucial Serie A match with Fiorentina.
The Diavoli have to avoid defeat by more than two goals at the Stadio Franchi to clinch an automatic Champions League berth.
‘Carletto’ is seemingly headed for west London and it has now emerged that it all started back in March, when Blues chief Roman Abramovich approached the tactician to test his commitment to the Diavoli.
The Russian tycoon had publicly attempted to take the former Juventus boss to Stamford Bridge last summer, although he got no change out of the trainer. Therefore, he kept things under wraps this time around and opted to use a ‘trojan horse’ - Andriy Shevchenko - rather than an outside intermediary.
The Ukrainian, who is on loan at the San Siro from Chelsea, has barely featured this term, but La Gazzetta dello Sport claims he played an important translating role in meetings.
Ancelotti, who is tied to the Rossoneri until 2010, is expected to pen a three-year deal with Chelsea worth €5 million per season until June 2012. Vince Masiello, Goal.com Bravo Sheva!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
May 27 2009, 12:49 AM
|
Pulcini 99
Group: Full Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 26-April 09
Member No.: 6,415
|
QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ May 27 2009, 12:09 AM) ...the motivation problem is bigger then Carlo. I'm in a point were I dare saying that it's possible we never will solve this problem; the Maldini game is one example. Just the sole match should have been enough, with or without "the idiot" Carlo to be motivated 100%. But again - NO! I agree that sometimes they appear to lack motivation. I just don't know why you bring up the Roma game. The players looked motivatied enough to me, we may have lost, but we didn't play as bad as people would like to make it. We did have loads of chances, far more than Roma. It's not like you miss chances, make silly free kicks etc. because you lack motivation.
|
|
|
|
|
May 27 2009, 08:05 AM
|
Primavera
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23,206
Joined: 20-November 05
From: Athens, Hellas
Member No.: 911
|
QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ May 27 2009, 01:09 AM) ...the motivation problem is bigger then Carlo. I'm in a point were I dare saying that it's possible we never will solve this problem; the Maldini game is one example. Just the sole match should have been enough, with or without "the idiot" Carlo to be motivated 100%. But again - NO! There are players that are constantly playing at 50%... Seedorf, Pirlo and Kaka just don't do what they are supposed to do. When the coach is not showing them they should do more (and the only way to do so is to bench them) then that's how they'll keep playing. Maybe it's not possible to get them motivated but we don't know if that's true because Ancelotti has NEVER tried! QUOTE (GonzZo @ May 27 2009, 02:49 AM) I agree that sometimes they appear to lack motivation. I just don't know why you bring up the Roma game. The players looked motivatied enough to me, we may have lost, but we didn't play as bad as people would like to make it. We did have loads of chances, far more than Roma. It's not like you miss chances, make silly free kicks etc. because you lack motivation. You really think they were motivated against Roma? I certainly do no agree.
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|