QUOTE (mishie @ Oct 19 2006, 06:42 PM)
system seems to complicated to me and still a lack of width. pirlo is a playmaker pure and simple so yes he needs protection but thats not needed from behind but beside him. and with andreas range of passing if you play him deep it doesn't matter.
plus theres the added problem of marking him. if you push him up the pitch even a little your putting him to normal midfielders range by staying a little deeper he becomes more akward to mark thus if a team chooses to man mark him it leaves space in the midfield for kaka and seedorf to operate in
I don't think width would be an issue with that formation, you've got Kaka and Gourcuff or if he comes, R10 operating on the wide side of the pitch, and still have the fullbacks making their runs.
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Oct 19 2006, 06:50 PM)
mishie's got a good point, let's not forget Pirlo's not the pacy type, so it becomes even more risky to put him in range of their holding mids.
Better off to let him operate like a floater in mid-field. Coming back and forth as he pleases or rather as is required.
And width is an issue, lately that's something that's really opened up a chink in us. If you can't attack from the flanks it's a big dimension taken out of the attack. Our wingbacks are not attacking types per se.
I do agree that Pirlo would be much easier to mark if he was further up but the apposing team's defensive mids would have much more worries about Kaka and Gourcuff/R10 on the wide sides then Pirlo operating in the middle
And I think that with this formation we would have more width, because it wouldn't be just the fullbacks trying to push up but 2 attacking mids who can cross from the flanks or cut through the middle from the wide areas