QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Oct 20 2010, 10:58 PM)

Milan's plan was to spray passes around and hope to drag the Madrid team out of shape. Then play in the diagonal balls to the fast forwards.
1. This passing, slow-possession play is Milan's biggest strength. It's the old Carlo blueprint. Like a fencer in a sword fight. Pass around, drag the team out of shape and then attack through the gaps.
However Mourinho's team's greatest strength is in keeping their shape. So obviously it was gonna be a head on collision of strength against strength.
2.Next....there was an obsession in our team to keep our rigid 4-3-1-2 shape...which even if you just draw it on a paper, you can see is suspect against a 4-2-3-1. They'll just by pass our whole midfield along the flanks and they've got top notch players who can cut in one they bypass the mid-field.
3.This is what Allegri said before the match. The reason I don't criticise him as MUCH is that he seems to know beforehand what the status quo is. He did say that Milan will have to be perfect and not make mistakes (because our formation and personnel don't let us do anything else)...and we did exactly that.
1. The thing is, how can we consider it a "strength" when all its gotten us is mediocrity these last couple seasons? This system worked with Kaka, because he was a midfielder/striker hybrid. You mentioned we don't have spare gears, but with Kaka we in fact DID. We were capable of playing passes around the midfield while he dropped back, until he picked the perfect moment to go forward, at which point we DID change gears.
Now that we don't have him, and therefore that extra gear, why were we still employing this system? Given what we have now, playing to our "strengths" means we field an unbalanced team?
2. Which is precisely why a top-class manager would have realized this by fielding a midfield capable of protected our back line from those wingers cutting into the heart of the defense. If it was so obvious that the formation we sent out lacked the proper personnel to succeed and was so clearly susceptible to a 4-2-3-1, then why pray tell did we still field it!? Madrid attacked us from the get go and pressed high up the pitch. They did this to compensate for the lack of protection for their back line in terms of personnel — they had only Khedira.
It's not rocket science, when a team does that, you can't do anything but employ a counter attacking style. We MUST drop back, cut down as much space as we can, protect our back line. We must make the game a closed, ugly one. When there's a good opportunity to counter — say, down a flank exposed by an advancing Marcelo — we spring forward at pace with the respective player on that side (should have been Boateng), while still avoiding overcommitment (Zambro stays back) so as to open up the game. Our strikers feed off scraps. Zlatan holds play up to bring the likes of Boa, Antonini, Dinho forward, something Zlatan is excellent at doing..and Pato reads the space accordingly.
The pace needed to transition from defense would have been provided by Antonini and Boateng, the counter attacks would have been launched by Pirlo. If Dinho wasn't effective, he should have been replaced at halftime or at the very least by the 60th minute.
Way too many of us said all of this before a ball was kicked.
3. Any manager can say "we need to be perfect". In a match against Real Madrid, perfection starts with your tactics Mr. Allegri, and you got them wrong. Understanding the "status quo" that has seen us dump out to Arsenal, Man U, and lose to Inter several times is nothing worthy of credit — those tactics were naive too! We knew if he did what he did we'd lose. Furthermore, once again his substitutions were late (a recurring trend)...
This post has been edited by vnata001: Oct 21 2010, 08:18 AM