The point that he wanted to mention is the worst that can happen, well almost the worst.
But still I dont agree with him. Why Nesta can play only 30 matches? No, he can play 40-50.
He took some examples to extrem.
His example is like saying: Barca have Eto'o and Henry as strikers but if both of them got injuried, than Gudjenson will have to step in, and he's not good enough so Barca must buy another striker (David Villa?) (IMG:
http://cyrus.medialayer.net/~m1ke/milanfan.com/forums/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)
So, I dont see a point in his topic. Injuries can happen to everyone, but we got depth. We have 5 CB's (Nesta-Maldini, Kaladze-Bonera, plus Simic)