  |
 Serie A - Week 31 - Milan - Inter, Date: 02/04/11 Time: 20:45 CET |
 Apr 3 2011, 10:54 AM
Post
#361
|
|
|
Esordienti B 96  Group: Full Members Posts: 288 Joined: 25-July 06 From: kuala lumpur Member No.: 2,171  |
we're lucky it's Abbiati's day, we could've conceded twice if it wasn't for him.. and the linesman as well |
 |
 
|
|
Apr 3 2011, 01:14 PM
Post
#362
|
|
|
Allievi Nazionali Group: Full Members Posts: 9,420 Joined: 14-August 09 Member No.: 6,730 |
QUOTE (rip @ Apr 3 2011, 05:58 AM)  Robinho may want to learn finishing from Flamini. granted the goal was offside, but his finishing was better than Robinho's (IMG:style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif) Robinho's finishing was clinical at City, admittedly only at home. I don't know why his shooting is so poor now. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2011, 04:29 PM
Post
#363
|
|
|
The brightest sun is the purest gun Group: Full Members Posts: 26,840 Joined: 23-June 06 From: Albania Member No.: 2,008 |
QUOTE (pacang @ Apr 3 2011, 11:54 AM) we're lucky it's Abbiati's day, we could've conceded twice if it wasn't for him.. and the linesman as well The linesman? He was pinpoint in both occasions. First of all, Abbiati's save was at the line. SkyCalcio had a special camera from above which made it abundantly clear the ball did not pass all the line. Secondly, yes, Pato was faintly offside, but in the doubt FIFA says the flag shouldn't be raised. Thus, the linesman made the right decision. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2011, 05:48 PM
Post
#364
|
|
|
Giovanissimi Nazionali Group: Full Members Posts: 2,083 Joined: 10-August 09 From: South Carolina Member No.: 6,716 |
Pato's center of gravity was onside, which I thought was the rule?
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2011, 07:03 PM
Post
#365
|
|
|
Esordienti B 96 Group: Full Members Posts: 317 Joined: 28-September 09 Member No.: 6,832 |
Not got a lot to say (for once (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) )
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FORZA MILAN!! |
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2011, 08:04 PM
Post
#366
|
|
|
Allievi Regionali B Group: Full Members Posts: 7,004 Joined: 5-August 09 From: CTU Member No.: 6,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2011, 09:16 PM
Post
#367
|
|
|
Smoking Bianco Group: Helpers Posts: 14,039 Joined: 15-August 05 From: KWT Member No.: 191 |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2011, 01:53 AM
Post
#368
|
|
|
Giovanissimi Nazionali Group: Helpers Posts: 4,373 Joined: 25-November 05 From: East Sussex Member No.: 932 |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2011, 11:53 AM
Post
#369
|
|
|
Esordienti B 96 Group: Full Members Posts: 288 Joined: 25-July 06 From: kuala lumpur Member No.: 2,171 |
QUOTE (Dracoris @ Apr 4 2011, 12:48 AM) Pato's center of gravity was onside, which I thought was the rule? whoa.. that would make things difficult, wouldn't it? |
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2011, 12:17 PM
Post
#370
|
|
|
Primavera Group: Helpers Posts: 18,058 Joined: 9-February 06 Member No.: 1,265 |
QUOTE (X-Offender @ Apr 3 2011, 07:59 PM) The linesman? He was pinpoint in both occasions. First of all, Abbiati's save was at the line. SkyCalcio had a special camera from above which made it abundantly clear the ball did not pass all the line. Could you find a video/image of this special shot you're talking about? QUOTE Secondly, yes, Pato was faintly offside, but in the doubt FIFA says the flag shouldn't be raised. Thus, the linesman made the right decision. I don't understand, it's ridiculous to rule out something like that as offside. it was a matter of a few centimeters and even for that we needed to watch the reply a couple of times to decide. the offside rule should be used to prevent unfair advantages like when an attacker is a few steps ahead of his opponent. Pato had no advantage over Cambiasso whatsoever. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2011, 01:10 PM
Post
#371
|
|
|
Allievi Regionali B Group: Helpers Posts: 5,148 Joined: 5-October 05 From: Bristol Member No.: 558 |
QUOTE (Ry4n @ Apr 4 2011, 01:53 AM) After watching that it was clear that Maicon moved his inside hand(his right) to stop Clarence's shot and so should have been a penalty. I also saw a clip earlier and it showed Flamini in line with their defence so he wasn't offside, have a look: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4896WiH2Hz0...player_embedded |
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2011, 01:48 PM
Post
#372
|
|
|
Berretti  Group: Moderators Posts: 12,004 Joined: 1-August 05 From: Torquay Member No.: 90 |
QUOTE (I_Rossoneri @ Apr 4 2011, 01:10 PM) After watching that it was clear that Maicon moved his inside hand(his right) to stop Clarence's shot and so should have been a penalty. It still looks ball to hand, I don't think he moved his hand to block it but when your hand is out that far and comes in contact with the ball you definitely risk giving one away, and I have seen them given before. Did Maicon intentionally move his hand to block it, I don't think so, if he did we should sign him as a back-up GK, did you see how quick that shot was travelling?! |
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2011, 01:52 PM
Post
#373
|
|
|
Primavera Group: Moderators Posts: 18,833 Joined: 5-April 06 From: Croatia, Zagreb Member No.: 1,564 |
I don't know, if you ask me it was a clear handball penalty. Intention or not, we cannot read Maicons mind, but the hand delfected the ball and was not in a natural position. I've seen penalties give for a less obvious handball.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2011, 03:35 PM
Post
#374
|
|
|
Giovanissimi Nazionali Group: Full Members Posts: 2,083 Joined: 10-August 09 From: South Carolina Member No.: 6,716 |
Sure it was ball to hand but the hand was in a very unnatural position, therefore penalty.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2011, 03:54 PM
Post
#375
|
|
|
Giovanissimi Nazionali Group: Helpers Posts: 4,373 Joined: 25-November 05 From: East Sussex Member No.: 932 |
QUOTE (I_Rossoneri @ Apr 4 2011, 04:10 PM) I also saw a clip earlier and it showed Flamini in line with their defence so he wasn't offside, have a look: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4896WiH2Hz0...player_embedded damn , wish that had counted aswell ! This post has been edited by Ry4n: Apr 4 2011, 03:54 PM |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 02:27 PM |
