 |

Paloschi joins Parma |
|
|
|
|
Aug 27 2008, 02:06 PM
|
Loves Greek Women esp Fay

Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,924
Joined: 19-May 06
From: Bangalore,India
Member No.: 1,865

|
Ok let's break this down. We need Paloschi to have first team experience in a good club. The best avenue for that would be Parma. But Parma say, they will not take him on loan, only on co-ownership. What then? Do we keep him on in the roster and make him play 1 match a month?? That would be selfish, in my native tongue, the analogy would be the 'dog in the stable'. That doesn't let the horse eat the hay, nor does it touch the hay itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 27 2008, 02:26 PM
|
Loves Greek Women esp Fay

Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,924
Joined: 19-May 06
From: Bangalore,India
Member No.: 1,865

|
Oh for Pete's sake.. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) Let me make it clear the last time, since nobody seems to get it. Teams don't loan first team prospects, coz the smaller team is not interested. That particular market does not seem to exist, esp for clubs with flourishing youth academies, like Milan, Juve etc. Still not convinced...ok my last freaking try. We've been loaning out Borriello for years. And shite happened. We sold him on a co-ownership to Genoa, and boom first season...Yippee-ki-yay, motherf@cker!! And if one of y'all even think of saying it was the cocaine he sniffed, I'll go ballistic... (IMG: style_emoticons/default/realmad.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 27 2008, 02:32 PM
|
Prima Squadra
           
Group: Helpers
Posts: 30,194
Joined: 11-March 07
From: Birmingham, England
Member No.: 3,660

|
QUOTE (Jack Sparrow @ Aug 27 2008, 02:26 PM)  Let me make it clear the last time, since nobody seems to get it. Teams don't loan first team prospects, coz the smaller team is not interested. I disagree. Why would Parma not want a hot prospect for free for a whole season, I don't see what they would lose from this. Do you really think Parma would say "No, even though Paloschi is agreat player and would improve us, we don't want him for free.. we'd rather pay for him". Loanage is ownage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 27 2008, 02:50 PM
|
Prima Squadra

Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,655
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109

|
QUOTE (whoarethepatriots @ Aug 27 2008, 12:55 PM)  AAAARRRRGGGGHHHH
WHY? WHY NOT LOAN? We will now stupidly buy him back for 6-10 million when we could have just loaned him out The simple reason that it's not a loan deal is because Parma would have no incentive to play him if he's still only there on loan. Why should they play a player that they don't own only for him to get the experiance needed only for the bigger club to come in and snatch him up once they think he's ready? Anyway, co-ownership will always favour the bigger club, so it's nothing to worry about
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 27 2008, 03:17 PM
|
Prima Squadra

Group: Moderators
Posts: 39,655
Joined: 6-January 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 1,109

|
QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Aug 27 2008, 01:55 PM)  Because he'll improve their team? Are people telling me that if Milan offered Kaka' out on loan to an Italian club they would all say "No thanks, we'd have no incentive to play him"? (IMG: style_emoticons/default/huh.gif) Still tht player will be taken back by the bigger club. Kaka is Kaka, and he would be played, not that it will ever happen (IMG: style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif) For example, look at Giovinco last season at Empoli, he was one of their best players, but he always got subbed out or wasn't played becuase he was just a loaned player
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
 |