QUOTE (dst @ Mar 13 2014, 08:48 PM)

If not, goodbye FFP.
If not and no action is taken, then yes bye bye UEFA football credability for me (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Bare in mind Arsenal has complained to UEFA about City's sponsorship deal, except City have used most of that funding to invest in developments around the Etihad stadium. City might have a valid justification in that.
PSG however way I look at their deal, they are bound to get disqualified! If not, then there will most likely be a riot in Europe, as the money they have been spending astronomical amounts during the three first year period under revision, the question of fair value to market will be asked by European clubs who will demand explanations and expecting PSG to be punished. However, some might take this
idea seriously, yet I don't because all other sports teams in the world can not get such deals, but if it does turn out that way then we need a filthy rich benefactor who has the WC coming up to invest through these creative sponsorship deals.
QUOTE (Danny @ Mar 13 2014, 10:26 PM)

Not a chance in hell. PSG and City have become heavyweights. They make UEFA way too much cash in CL participation to be banned from it.
IMHO FFP is a theoretical notion. A PC way of making it all look like there's a level playing field when there isn't. And I don't even mind tbh.
We just need to start fixing our fiscals and our squad in order to catch up with it...
FFP is only valid if the sponsorship deals are at fair value, if PSG is given a dodgy pass score by the panel in April, I expect heavy criticism from ALL clubs in Europe.
Milan has decent sponsorship deals, lower than Arsenals or Bayern. Remember bwin, Madrid had a bigger sponsorship package than us. But that is because fair value for Madrid is larger than ours, yet nowhere close to PSG deals.
This post has been edited by Rossoneri7: Mar 13 2014, 09:40 PM