QUOTE
Flamini's wages were justified when we brought him, it's the club's probem that they didn't re-negotiate a longer and less financially weighing contract with him. Ambro and Rino's deals have recently been renewed. And that is why it's so ridiciulous. Giving Ambro that kind of money when Nesta accepted the 2m deal.
You see, again you're not objective enough. How come Flamini's wage is the clubs problem, but Ambro and Rino's isn't? Doesn't make any sense. But yes, I do know why Matteo has such a darn wage sum. But anyway,...
QUOTE
My only excuse is that these days, he's better. It's simple really, it shouldn't be a rocket science, and if we're going to keep one of the 3, then that has to be Flamini
Naah, that's a very very lame excuse, near to the one I made for Ambro. In fact, let me play a bit with you logic: Ambro is useless but Flamini isn't because he's better then useless. So, if you exclude Ambro from the equation, you've got Flamini who's the worst of all (not counting Rino for anything). And then what?
Again, my point is Flamini is okay, but why bother with a reconvalescent DM that never showed up and negotiate a reduced wage when you can easily find an replacement for him?