QUOTE (dst @ Apr 23 2011, 11:33 PM)

My first thought concerns the field. As players have become more athletic the field has been made to look narrower because they're able to cover big areas more quickly than they did before. So I believe if fields were wider the extra space would really help the game in speed and rhythm.
I can't agree. This isn't America where we have to try and make it more exciting, more goals, whatever. The pitch limitations are fine as they are, in my opinion.
QUOTE (dst @ Apr 23 2011, 11:33 PM)

Another one is about substitutions. I don't see why they have to be limited to three... what's the point? give more freedom to the coaches and make it so that even players that have come off the field can be brought on again.
There's nothing more boring than the end of games when substitutions keep being made. Imagine if you could make as many as you want. There would just be far too much time-wasting. The point of having 3 is to make the game more tactical and such. It's a bit stupid if you can essentially just bring on a group of attackers whenevr you get a free kick, then when you take the lead bring on 7 defenders or something. It'd turn into the NFL.
QUOTE (dst @ Apr 23 2011, 11:33 PM)

what do you think?
No referees. Prison rules football. At least you don't have mistakes ruining every game.
I think chips in the balls is a good idea from X-Off. That saves the time wasting aspect of having to go to video reviews and stuff.