QUOTE (TheOgre @ Jun 14 2017, 11:05 PM)

I believe our top offer before was around $60 million total and now offering $80 essentially split over two years.
Actually the reported offer we made was 45m + Zapata and Niang. So this is significantly more and very close to his release clause.
If this offer is really true, I think they'd accept as no club will offer them this much and if they keep him they risk his price falling if he doesn't have a good season (doubtful as Belotti is a machine)
Anyway, Fassone said that they didn't discuss Belotti in their meating with the Torino SD yesterday. However I find it hard to believe that they spent nearly 2 hourse talking about Zapata and Niang. Belotti's name surely must have come up. And if Toro really are interested in some of our players, we should use that as leverage. Too bad Bacca wouldn't want to go there. I'm sure Miha would want him if we offered him + cash in exchange for Belotti
QUOTE (X-Offender @ Jun 14 2017, 11:17 PM)

The fact that we want to sign another forward does it mean that we want to play with two strikers? In that case, it'd be a 4-4-2 with Suso and Bona on the flanks, and Kessie and potentially Biglia in center midfield.
I'd hate it if we opted for 3-5-2 instead.
Who knows at this point, I think we need to see what the next signings will be (aside from Conti and Biglia which are basically on lock).
I think Montella will use 2 or 3 formations. This season he was restricted to the 4-3-3 but given the options he'll have next season I honeslty can't see him using it as our main formation
QUOTE (d'Arc.LP @ Jun 15 2017, 01:59 AM)

I was thinking this too. We bought Rodriguez and we are going to buy Conti, we wont play 3-5-2 for sure.
But with a 2 men midfield, I am not sure I would be confortable with Biglia - Kessie pair. We need someome better than Biglia. Unless we are getting Biglia for rotation purposes.
Rodriguez can play as a FB in a back 4, a WB in a 3-man defensive system or even as one of the CBs in said 3-man defensive system. He's a very versatile player.
Same goes for Conti, he can be used as a FB or WB, in fact he was used as a WB at Atalanta
The problem with a back 3 is that it's so resource heavy. We don't have enough CBs to pull this off, especially with Paletta and Zapata both likely leaving in the summer and just one replacement coming in. I think we'll only use a back 3 on rare occasions
QUOTE (X-Offender @ Jun 15 2017, 07:52 AM)

Well, both Conti and Rodriguez can play as side midfielders as well, but I don't think Montella will opt for a 3-man defense right away.
Agreed. I think he'll definately utilise the formation if need be because he has the players to do it, but I can't see it being his go-to formation
QUOTE (d'Arc.LP @ Jun 15 2017, 08:26 AM)

What would happen with Suso, Bonaventura (who is better at wing) and other wingers we migjht sign in the mean time ? And I dont think Rodriguez and Conti would come just to fill the bench. That would be poor business from us.
Personalli I think that if we sign another striker like Belotti, we will br playing 4-4-2 providing we dont sell Lapadula who would be a backup with Cutrone OR wr would play 4-2-3-1 with Silva as a Trequartista, who can play even in midfield as he said. Actually this makes even more sense.
i'd love for use to go for a 4-2-3-1. But again, it depends on who we're going after next.
It seems like we'll definately bring in another striker, just a matter of if we're bringing him in as a backup or to partner up with Silva