So, Mediaset is reporting that Leonardo is after Antonini. I'd welcome this move, if Galliani has another fullback in mind. But, Antonini is a good backup and has the needed experience, therefore he will be hard to replace (as a backup).

Also, we are again linked with Ogbonna. What do you guys know of him?

Napoli midfielder Marek Hamsik believes that signing for AC Milan would be a "professional development", but his current club appear reluctant to sell to Massimiliano Allegri's side.

Speculation has strongly suggested Hamsik could join Milan this summer, although it remains to be seen if the Serie A champions will meet Napoli's asking price of around €100 million (£90 million).

Slovakia international Hamsik has reiterated his desire to sign for the Rossoneri, but it appears Napoli would prefer to sell the 23-year-old to Milan's fierce city rivals Inter.

"It would be a professional development, so I cannot promise Napoli anything," he said in La Gazetta dello Sport. "They are one of the most successful clubs in the world."

However, Napoli President Aurelio De Laurentiis told the Corriere dello Sport: "He costs €100 million. Besides, if I really do have to sell Hamsik, I'd give him to Inter.

"(Milan vice-president) Adriano Galliani never asked me for him, whereas (Inter president) Massimo Moratti did and was very polite about it.

"He asked me three years ago for Hamsik, then two months ago enquired if anything had changed. I replied no, but I was impressed by his attitude.

"I promised to Moratti that if things do change, then Inter will have a sort of moral option on Hamsik."

I think it's better if we play with ten men than with Antonini, so I'd welcome this move either way..

Surely, that's exaggerated. Point is, I don't see us signing a proper backup then, at least not for free or at a low price. So I'd stick with him as backup player, unless PSG are willing to negotiate over Sakho (which is unlike).

That's just absurd. I'm not a fan of Antonini, gee, I don't even like the guy, but how can you say Vilà and De Vito are better? On what basis?

Then you haven't been watching football for a long time I guess. You're exaggerating, Antonini is a fair player, just totally average. On the other hand Vilà and De Vito are still young players who's potential can't be judged by one or two matches.

Then you haven't been watching football for a long time I guess. You're exaggerating, Antonini is a fair player, just totally average. On the other hand Vilà and De Vito are still young players who's potential can't be judged by one or two matches.

My friend, we clearly have two different opinions on rating players and maybe even about football as a sport activity. Hopefully, this is a democratic society, so, get used to it, and when I say it, I mean, someone actually disagreeing with you and having different opinion.

Antonini one of the worst full-backs I've seen play for a high rated team like Milan

Well, that's my style. What should I do? Look at your comment:



And I'll add:

Taribo West, Kakha Kaladze, Cosmin Contra, Thomas Helveg's last days, Francesco Coco, Giuseppe Cardone, etc. All of them played at Antoninis level or even below. That's why I said it seems you haven't been watching Milan for a long time.

Kaladze was good as left-back, he was only bad at the end when he only played as central defender. He never was a bad left-back for Milan like Antonini is. But we clearly rate Antonini different, so this is pointless.