 |

Paloschi, Alberto Paloschi |
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 03:54 PM
|
Primavera

Group: Moderators
Posts: 23,206
Joined: 20-November 05
From: Athens, Hellas
Member No.: 911

|
Isn't it pretty obvious already that the weaker Italian clubs will not accept loan deals from the big clubs? There's nothing we're doing wrong...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 06:30 PM
|
Loves Greek Women esp Fay

Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,924
Joined: 19-May 06
From: Bangalore,India
Member No.: 1,865

|
QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Jan 27 2011, 10:21 PM)  I agree. No team in their right mind would want a player better than what they already have, for free, for entire season. It's not for free...and it's not better than what they have. Coz for sure, we should have loaned Paloschi and paid his wages, coz I mean Hernan frickin Crespo is a nobody right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 06:40 PM
|
Allievi Regionali B
       
Group: Full Members
Posts: 6,098
Joined: 24-February 10
From: Lebanon
Member No.: 7,239

|
Jack Sparrow:Most of the time it is the case kurt described.Maybe the Paloschi case doesn't apply 100 percent though.
Also,why would we pay for his wages.In my view,if you loan out a player,most of the time it is a good deal for the team that received that player.Firstly,you get the player for free,you only pay for his wages,and it is short-term.If he flops,you can just send him back to where he came from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 06:47 PM
|
Loves Greek Women esp Fay

Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,924
Joined: 19-May 06
From: Bangalore,India
Member No.: 1,865

|
Precisely...now this way, both clubs have something to gain. If he flops...then Milan just get rid of his half of the contract for the earlier proposed sum. If he turns out to be really good, then the lowly club who actually invested in his training and wages, get something back in terms of increased value for their half of the player...so they're not left high and dry when this player leaves. Instead they get something they can use to at least buy a new player. The 10 million Genoa got for Borriello could have gone into getting a comparable striker. If it had been a simple loan, Genoa just lost a 19 goal a season striker....with squat to show for it..so they're now stuck with one less star player on the roster. Don't forget in Italy, a few positions here and there doesn't make a big difference in Serie A in terms of money. In the EPL you can argue that the 19 goal striker might have earned the club an extra 5 million by virtue of their higher position..not in Serie A. Rather than thinking of this as a simple player transfer....think of the two clubs as Venture Capitalists investing in a new firm. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) It'll make sense. Cut your loses or increase the value of your stake. Simple maths.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 28 2011, 02:53 AM
|
Primavera

Group: Moderators
Posts: 18,833
Joined: 5-April 06
From: Croatia, Zagreb
Member No.: 1,564

|
Let's get back to the topic, shall we?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
 |