 |

General Football Talk, For random debates and articles |
|
|
|
|
Aug 16 2010, 03:57 PM
|
Prima Squadra
           
Group: Helpers
Posts: 30,194
Joined: 11-March 07
From: Birmingham, England
Member No.: 3,660

|
QUOTE Sepp Blatter says Fifa is considering scrapping draws at the group stage of future World Cup finals by introducing penalty shoot-outs after 90 minutes. Blatter, president of world football's governing body, is known for voicing radical ideas on changing the game. He wants to put an end to defence-minded teams playing to get a draw. "If there is no winner at the end of 90 minutes of play, we would proceed directly to penalty kicks," he told German magazine Focus. "We are considering doing away with draws in the first round... and also ending extra-time play." Another possibility, according to Blatter, would be to revive the "golden goal". Under that rule if a match is a draw after normal time then the first team to score a goal in extra-time is the winner. It was used in the 1998 competition in France but was abandoned four years later when the finals were held in Japan and South Korea. Blatter feels the changes could make the tournament more interesting, insisting teams "above all do not want to lose - that makes for a boring game". The next World Cup will be held in Brazil in 2014. Blatter also reiterated Fifa's efforts to examine goal-line technology, which will be discussed at October's International Football Association Board meeting. "As soon as we have a safe, fast and uncomplicated goal indicator, we will use it," he said. BBC SportHmmm. This 'no draws' thing sounds very American and I don't like it. It'd also make for very boring football with bad teams playing a 10-0-0 formation and trying to win it in a shootout. I think having a shootout after every group game (regardless of the result) to be used as a tie-breaker instead of goal-difference if teams finish on the same points would be okay. Big no to Golden Goal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 16 2010, 04:52 PM
|
Berretti

Group: Moderators
Posts: 12,004
Joined: 1-August 05
From: Torquay
Member No.: 90

|
Why would introducing penalties make any difference?! So a team like North Korea would put 11 men on their goal line and wait for 90 minutes hoping they could win on penalties!
The only way to guarantee more action and attacking displays would be to like Rugby, if a team puts say a difference of 3 goals past their opposition they get a bonus point + the usual 3 points they'd normally pick up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 16 2010, 08:33 PM
|
Giovanissimi Regionali B
     
Group: Full Members
Posts: 1,309
Joined: 28-August 09
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Member No.: 6,771

|
QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Aug 16 2010, 09:57 AM)  Hmmm.
This 'no draws' thing sounds very American and I don't like it. It'd also make for very boring football with bad teams playing a 10-0-0 formation and trying to win it in a shootout.
I think having a shootout after every group game (regardless of the result) to be used as a tie-breaker instead of goal-difference if teams finish on the same points would be okay. Big no to Golden Goal. I hate the idea of making any changes to the group stage. Getting a point for a draw is just fine. I think the Golden Goal in the knockout rounds is great though. As if the stakes in extra time weren't high enough, it just ups the ante more and would be more exciting for fans. What could be more exciting than a game ending and a team progressing/being eliminated with a goal, rather than, "OK we scored, now let's play defense/stall/fake injury/play in the corner for the last 10 minutes of extra time".
This post has been edited by servbot: Aug 16 2010, 08:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 User(s) are reading this topic (7 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
 |