Age? Nah, the only problem with him is his shitty attitude. The guy is a sore loser, he has no dignity. He just goes after money and fame. For example, if he came on loan and had a great season with us, he'd go back to Barcelona before you could say Blueberry pie. I don't want people like that in my team, even if it means having another shitty season.

This post has been edited by X-Offender: Jun 20 2010, 11:33 AM

yeah true i didn't look at it in that way. i only saw it as ibra the player rather than the person...

I hope your feelings will prove right.
I want Ibra here !

isn't Storari going to Juventus for 5 m?

When u say Ibra, do u mean Ibrahimovic, as in Zlatan Ibrahimovic?
wasn't he going to Premier Leuage ?

most likely

and about Ibrahimovic... I don't want him, let's take Dzeko instead if we are willing to spend money on a CF

Yeah that one who plays for Barcelona.
He dont want to go to a team that it's not in CHL.
So Man city is out.
I we would have thier money , Ibrahimovic would be ours long time ago.

I would take Dzeko instead of Ibra, his performing is not as good as Dzeko and how much is Ibra worth?

Ibra is a proved champion. How about Dzeko ?
Ibra > Dzeko.
Ibra costs 40 mil = Dzeko 40 mil
Ibras wage 12 mil/ year > Dezkos wage 4 mil/year
Ibra's 28 > Dzeko's 24

I still think Ibra is better than Dzeko. We don't have money and luck to have Ibra here.

I'd rather let Jack roast me over a fire than see ibrahimovic wear a Milan jersey, for much the same reasons that XOff stated.

I just can't see Ibra wearing a Milan jearsy..

No way we can afford Ibra's wages. Unless of course we were bringing him on loan. That's not really a bad deal. If we're holding on to him long enough for Dzeko to get off contract.

I'm perfectly cool with us loaning Ibra. Using him just like he's used every club he's ever played in- for his own damn benefit.

Loan in Ibra. R80, Ibra, Pato is a damn good forward lineup. We might even challenge for CL with that (coz Ibra has got the Serie A tied down, leaving us to unleash Pippo in the CL nights).

Once the season's done, send him back to Barca. So long and thanks for all the fish.

Zambrotta is also a proven champion, still I would take Santon over him. Both 40 mio? Then Dzeko easy going. Dzeko is younger so you will pay less for each year he still can play top level, and also earns waaaaaaaaaaay less on wages. Dzeko is younger, cheaper (including wages), better attitute etc. Dzeko just started being in his prime or soon will be, while Ibrahimovic has lots years of it already past it. Sheva was also proven and when he came back he sucked. If Dzeko is a gamble, Ibrahimovic is too, there are no guarantees. Both I think both will do very well for us, but obviously I prefer Dzeko. If Ibrahimovic isn't the big big big star in the team he might suck though. What if Pato becomes our star? I think short term both good, long term Dzeko good and Ibrahimovic bad. Ibrahimovic is IMO the bigger gamble and the big jerk. Dzeko will soon represents Milan for many years or forever, while Zlatan represent Inter (and Jube).
Loan Zlatan, then a year later we still need to spend big for a top class CF, while already used 20 mio on wages + taxes forr Zlatan. Then sign atmiditly Dzeko instead will ya please.

This post has been edited by CHU-LIP: Jun 20 2010, 02:18 PM

I'd gut you first, you accursed fish!



Agree with everything except that bolded part. The only thing he's represented is his own self. But if we can't land Dzeko, and instead are waiting to grab him on a free (like Flamini), I see nothing wrong in loaning Ibra over. Buying him is out of the question. I don't care how much galliani likes Raiola.

Okay, that's true. The guy cares only about himself, and has never cared about any club so yeah he doesn't represent any club and never will.