QUOTE (zdrossoneri @ Sep 21 2008, 11:18 PM)

An innocent question:
If we keep winning most of our games in the next 45-60 day, would people still think Pirlo is absolutely irreplaceable and Milan can't play football without him?
Because so far his absence hasn't disabled Milan, if anything, we've started winning our games and playing better football.
all this does is reinforce my theory that we cant play with pirlo and 2 def mids (even it's flamini who has played very well and ambro who's fairly consistent). pirlo is described by some as a no.10, but he isnt a pure one. a pure no.10 is a kaka,van der vaart, zidane who is capable of attacking defenders, dribbling, setting u p teammates score goals etc. pirlo is a pure playmaker and slows the game down, then factor in the other defensive mids who start deep and take too much time to get involved in the attack results in what we wee. i mean pirlo is pirlo, we all know what he can do. but we've all observed how slow and predictable we've become and thats been our main problem with our creativity. we need more mobility starting from our midfield and also our forwards. remember back a few years ago the only midfield cover we had was pirlo and gattuso (not pirlo and flamini,gattusso, emerson, etc (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/sleep.gif) ) and we were awesome offensively and we dint exactly crumble defensively (IMG:
style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) .
when pirlo comes back i'd like to see him with with either ambro or flamini played in a pure defensive mid role, and play with a couple of strikers or ronnie,kaka, seedorf supporting a CF.
This post has been edited by Habitant: Sep 22 2008, 12:28 AM