Well, point is - it really wasn't a lottery. Even before the shootout started, Holland lost. Just think about it; a young keeper who clearly isn't cut for penalty saves also lost maybe the last piece of confidence by being substituted a minute before the Costa Rica shootout. Now, when the stakes are even higher, he has to do the job, and his pale face was the complete opposite of what Krul presented.
Such as unsporting conduct? I'd choose a nervous keeper over one who violates the integrity of the game like Krul did.
QUOTE
The fact that Huntelaar made absolutely zero was predictable. Hey, maybe Krul should have subbed off Persie and played the last part - the effect would be pretty much same.
Why was LvG playing with the rightback position? Clearly players like Verboeve are not cut for the job. He should have relied on Janmaat and not experiment with Kuyt and other options.
Why was LvG playing with the rightback position? Clearly players like Verboeve are not cut for the job. He should have relied on Janmaat and not experiment with Kuyt and other options.
Kuyt was one of the best players for the Dutch yesterday.
QUOTE
Also, bringing in Clasie (did he even play before this match?) wasn't exactly helpful. If he wanted to win the games and avoid penalties, he should have brought in Depay or Lens. At one point Argentina was playing with 4 forwards and lost completely composure. A good midfield runner or an extra thinker would have sealed the deal for Holland.
Again, Clasie was excellent. He had at least one incredibly timed tackle on Messi as I recall.
QUOTE
Nah, I think LvG became a bit arrogant and made a couple of mistakes in yesterdays match.
I agree with you often but not here. If LVG had made all the mistakes you imply this match wouldn't even have GONE to ET.
And overall the best player on the pitch was Mascherano, who might just have proven himself as the world's best DM in that match. He made things tougher for the Dutch than the cakewalk you imply it should have been.