QUOTE (vnata001 @ Nov 4 2010, 11:00 PM)
yeah but there are also some games where Ronaldo rips his opposing full back to shreds and scores 4 times.
it's obvious that no matter who guards him, he's going to give that defender A LOT of difficulty. The fact that he didn't score when cutting in from the left, tested abbiati once from nearly 30 meters out (doesn't matter who defends him, he'll still hit that shot), and didn't put in too many deadly crosses from the left is testament enough to whatever cover Abate was able to provide for our CBs from C-Ron. Considering he didn't rip our backline up entirely, i'd say it was an OK job by our guy. you make it sound like C-Ron completely trampled all over our defense. he didn't have that rampant a time...
so essentially, the logic for both is similar. Abate can play against smaller teams. Antonini has 'been mostly good this season' against smaller teams. So, Antonini and Abate can play all they want against bad teams, but against good sides they're both trouble. I have always maintained I find Antonini an average player, from the day he hit our lineup on a consistent basis (similar to how I said Huntelaar is an average player the day we signed him).
Meanwhile Abate is 23 while Antonini is 28. In the long run, I prefer to see Abate play in big games while he's young, and see if he can learn from it. Antonini is already as good as hes going to be, and is little more than an average player.
Agreed there. In the long run it would obviously be smarter to invest more time and effort on Abate no question about it. But imo Abate scares ma a lot more then Antonini. Again his Juve performance was just awful, but Antonini has played in a lot of big games in these past few months and I never really had anything bad to say about him, so I'm choosing to believe that he just had an off day at the office.
Abate or Antonini? Neither of them is really Milan material. It's another case of both players working their @sses off for my team so I find it hard to criticise, but if they're not really delivering defenisve stability to the team then they can run all they want they're still going to be a massive problem for us.
QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ Nov 4 2010, 11:46 PM)
Man, you really misstrust Pippo. I mean, how can you be right when just the last Serie A match when Pippo started (and scored) shows the exact opposite. What can possibly go that bad? I mean, Pato's zero-zero stat isn't a alternative that makes me think twice. Just give Pippo a shot.
When was it that Pippo started a league game?
He always came off the bench this season and scored might I add. Again, I'm not against Pippo, but imo he's best when coming off the bench, defenders are tired, he's quick and hard to handle, he can easily slip a defender or make them commit a foul in a dangerous area.
QUOTE (X-Offender @ Nov 5 2010, 04:17 AM)
I think Pirlo has been one of our best players so far, if not the best. Too bad his talent is being wasted by doing more defending than creating.
Agreed!
QUOTE (CHU-LIP @ Nov 5 2010, 08:44 AM)
That is the Pirlo I liked so much, strong in both defending and creating. I think that's a good thing. We play with Ronaldinho in front of him and the other midfielders, so he should create in a more attacking position than Pirlo, unfortunality, Ronaldinho fails in that every now and then, especially against tough sides.
Pirlo was never really great in the defensive area, Rino just shielded him completely so he gave that impression. Now that he's practically being left to dog it out on his own due to the way the midfield is being played and the quality of the DM, his defensive frailties are becoming glaringly obvious. He still qorks his @ss off trying to defend and create but the man can't do it all, he's not 25 anymore, he plays every 3 days and has to work like a dog in every game