Possibly Finninvest does not want a huge amount of money spent? Since unlike Inter or Chelsea, this isn't exclusively Silvio's plaything. He has to answer a board etc. And the fact is Milan is Finninvest's lossmaking venture. And the economy of Italy isn't helping Finninvest either.
I'm not too worried about Chelsea or Man U. Man U for instance due to their debts have found themselves in the situation where they could be in serious financial trouble, if they don't finish in the quarters of the CL every season from now, for quite some time. And with Cristiano Ronaldo saying he's leaving...they might in a bit of a pickle. Chelsea...well 600 million pounds debt owed to Abramovich. Thank god for them, it's interest free. But if Roman decided he wanted out, they'd be f@cked.
Inter, have Moratti. He's the exception to the rule, since Inter seem to be the only Italian club who're spending crazy. But then they have a 100 million pound debt, and I don't think we know the deficit either. (I can't be sure about this though, it was some article Iread somewhere). The fact is winning the scudetto doesn't help Inter much, since there's not a lot of money being made. The money still comes from CL, and hence Mourinho is a last ditch attempt. If the Mourinho move fails, then Inter are in some trouble. (OF course Moratti can keep pouring in money).
As for the Silvio issue, well I can't say. He's into his 70s, maybe a little less flamboyant now. He's not looking to make a big name for himself by throwing out money every now and then. Besides he bought the club back in the 80s and after 20 years we still can't sustain ourselves. Mainly because of the huge loss we undertook in the mid-late 90s. When we bought all those stars and got shite. (well one scudetto!) I think Milan will splash, but they no longer want to chase any player and buy him to prove a point to the other clubs.
Milan don't believe in the galatico philosophy. Been there, done that, didn't work. While Madrid, Chelsea, Barca, Inter still do. We're a lot more cautious in our dealings now. One of my friends said it best. Nowadays for Milan, the mercato is a chessgame and not a game of poker where you up the stakes. Pato is a good buy. Whether you want to say, Brazillian influence or what not, fact is he wouldn't have signed up without being shown the money.
They're taking this rebuilding thing very seriously, and believe they'll only get one shot at it, and they can't afford to keep tweaking it left and right. So Pato is an excellent purchase. 14 million well spent. Gourcuff was not...6 million gone. Gila was not..net 11 mill loss.
Abbiati was first choice Milan keeper for 4 years, till Dida established himself as one of the best. Abbiati left for first team football, not because he was not good enough. I mean when Buffon is injured, and Juve say they want Abbiati as replacement, it means he isn't hopeless. And if you look at bang for buck, Abbiati is a prudent investment, maybe not longterm(too early to say), but still a good investment.
So far this new look team of ours has brought in Pato, Flamini and Zambrotta. All good enough to be first 11. And we already have a spine of Pirlo, Rino, Kaka, Seedorf, Nesta. So things are not horrible.
We're ok in the market, just careful. Too early to pass judgement.
Oh and don't believe the Maldini issue. It's just not possible. Remember how the Rino argument was supposedly because he wasn't given enough money?
And it turned out to be, merely clarifications on the future,and a bit of self doubt.
I already posted my thoughts on Maldini elsewhere. He's just weighing his options. It's not about the money. Can't be.