3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Van Ginkel, Marco van Ginkel

 
kurtsimonw
post Nov 6 2014, 02:46 PM
Post #31


Prima Squadra
************

Group: Helpers
Posts: 30,192
Joined: 11-March 07
From: Birmingham, England
Member No.: 3,660



QUOTE (X-Offender @ Nov 6 2014, 02:13 PM) *
We would have to pay €400,000 to Chelsea if MVG doesn't get 20 appearances. If he does, it's a free loan. More money thrown out of the window.

Wow.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
acid911
post Nov 6 2014, 03:30 PM
Post #32


Berretti
**********

Group: Helpers
Posts: 13,937
Joined: 26-February 08
From: Always Around
Member No.: 3,736



QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Nov 6 2014, 07:46 PM) *
Wow.

Amazing, even. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
Danny
post Nov 6 2014, 04:01 PM
Post #33


Allievi Nazionali
*********

Group: Full Members
Posts: 9,420
Joined: 14-August 09
Member No.: 6,730



QUOTE (Rossoneri7 @ Nov 6 2014, 12:26 PM) *
So your certain we wont be able to strike deals with Chelsea (or any other European team), because we didnt field this kid?

Ofcourse this noting that there were never guarantees that a loaned player would get playing time?

If you do, then its fine because its your opinion. i just see it differently (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


Apart from the 400,000 we'd have to pay if he didn't, no.

I'm sure Rami will love the 400,000 he gave Milan for his deal being wasted by the club in this way.

Nice one Pippo.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
Rossoneri7
post Nov 7 2014, 12:14 AM
Post #34


Smoking Bianco
**********

Group: Helpers
Posts: 14,039
Joined: 15-August 05
From: KWT
Member No.: 191



QUOTE (Danny @ Nov 6 2014, 07:01 PM) *
Apart from the 400,000 we'd have to pay if he didn't, no.

I'm sure Rami will love the 400,000 he gave Milan for his deal being wasted by the club in this way.

Nice one Pippo.


Do we know the terms of the agreement/contract to base a claim on such a clause? Or are we dependant on so&so said this/that?

I mean, yes absolutely, there very well could be such a clause. Heck lets say 200% there is such a clause, why are you upset? You claim he is a great prospect, no? 400K is 'measly' for his services.

Then what if Pippo scarcely plays him? We hade seen many prospect players; niang, gourcuff, paloschi, ses, balotelli, etc etc ... What I'm saying is, he might not be all that hype that accompanied him here. Certainly not after his dodgy approach to the side. But I'm not one to dwell on what he had done, trust Pippo wants to win and if he gets it wrong then its his mistake, but I would like to believe he has an idea in mind and is trying to tweak it proper.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
Fillipo Simone
post Nov 27 2014, 12:07 AM
Post #35


Primavera
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 18,833
Joined: 5-April 06
From: Croatia, Zagreb
Member No.: 1,564



But then you've gotta ask why we signed/loaned the guy in the first place. And since Muntari, Essien and Poli haven't exactly been stellar by now, I think we should give van Ginkel a chance to prove himself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
X-Offender
post Nov 27 2014, 12:23 AM
Post #36


The brightest sun is the purest gun
************

Group: Full Members
Posts: 26,836
Joined: 23-June 06
From: Albania
Member No.: 2,008



There are many things that should be done, Fillipo. Playing van Ginkel is only one of them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
Danny
post Nov 27 2014, 02:09 AM
Post #37


Allievi Nazionali
*********

Group: Full Members
Posts: 9,420
Joined: 14-August 09
Member No.: 6,730



QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ Nov 26 2014, 11:07 PM) *
But then you've gotta ask why we signed/loaned the guy in the first place. And since Muntari, Essien and Poli haven't exactly been stellar by now, I think we should give van Ginkel a chance to prove himself.


Not going to happen. Just like Armero.

Both are simply not wanted by stubborn and arrogant Pippo.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
Fillipo Simone
post Nov 27 2014, 12:06 PM
Post #38


Primavera
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 18,833
Joined: 5-April 06
From: Croatia, Zagreb
Member No.: 1,564



QUOTE (Danny @ Nov 27 2014, 04:09 AM) *
Not going to happen. Just like Armero.

Both are simply not wanted by stubborn and arrogant Pippo.

Well, we'll see. At least with Armero we don't miss anything. I'm 100% sure it's better we play MDS when available.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
Danny
post Nov 27 2014, 12:32 PM
Post #39


Allievi Nazionali
*********

Group: Full Members
Posts: 9,420
Joined: 14-August 09
Member No.: 6,730



QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ Nov 27 2014, 11:06 AM) *
Well, we'll see. At least with Armero we don't miss anything. I'm 100% sure it's better we play MDS when available.


You're missing the point.

Ok, Rami had a good match, but Pippo had no desire to use Armero at LB and MDS at RB when Abate was out. Essentially their best positions.

He rather played Bonera at LB ahead of Armero before Abate was available.

Point is Armero is badly treated, as is van Ginkel.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post


3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 01:56 PM