5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Signatures

 
kurtsimonw
post Apr 13 2010, 11:17 PM
Post #31


Prima Squadra
************

Group: Helpers
Posts: 30,192
Joined: 11-March 07
From: Birmingham, England
Member No.: 3,660



It's shameful isn't it. Abuse of power I'd say.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
mishie
post Apr 23 2010, 09:35 PM
Post #32


Giovanissimi Nazionali
*******

Group: Helpers
Posts: 2,623
Joined: 26-December 05
From: Inghilterra
Member No.: 1,072



truth hurts more like (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
Jack Sparrow
post Apr 24 2010, 04:41 AM
Post #33


Loves Greek Women esp Fay
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 14,924
Joined: 19-May 06
From: Bangalore,India
Member No.: 1,865



QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Apr 14 2010, 03:47 AM) *
It's shameful isn't it. Abuse of power I'd say.

Wimp!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
MizNelson
post Aug 8 2010, 10:20 PM
Post #34


Dida per sempre
*******

Group: Full Members
Posts: 4,198
Joined: 25-February 07
From: St. Francis
Member No.: 3,563



Why can't I attach a signature that's no more than 300px wide without getting a "too big/wide" warning, while there are ginormous signatures across the board here (Dracoris' immediately comes to mind)? It's pissing me off.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
Milan Are Brilli...
post Aug 9 2010, 04:33 PM
Post #35


Berretti
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 12,004
Joined: 1-August 05
From: Torquay
Member No.: 90



QUOTE (MizNelson @ Aug 8 2010, 10:20 PM) *
Why can't I attach a signature that's no more than 300px wide without getting a "too big/wide" warning, while there are ginormous signatures across the board here (Dracoris' immediately comes to mind)? It's pissing me off.

I thought from memory it was something to do with the filesize of the signature, i.e. it's too large a filesize.

Though, I did have some issues when I recently updated mine, and that's a size of 375px x 150px therefore the limitations of signatures may have been adjusted through the admin control panel recently. The people who have them at the moment I imagine haven't updated them for a while.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
kurtsimonw
post Aug 9 2010, 05:50 PM
Post #36


Prima Squadra
************

Group: Helpers
Posts: 30,192
Joined: 11-March 07
From: Birmingham, England
Member No.: 3,660



I can't change mine at all.

I even deleted my sig at one point, but it said it was too big.. there was nothing there!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
MizNelson
post Aug 9 2010, 08:52 PM
Post #37


Dida per sempre
*******

Group: Full Members
Posts: 4,198
Joined: 25-February 07
From: St. Francis
Member No.: 3,563



m1ke? Anyone?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
m1ke
post Aug 9 2010, 09:35 PM
Post #38


Administrator
*******

Group: Admin
Posts: 4,291
Joined: 1-July 05
From: London
Member No.: 1



Hmm - just had a look at this. The limits are currently 150:500:200 (SIZE(kb):WIDTH(px):HEIGHT(px)). If anyone has a sig that falls outside of either of these values, then it's probably because they had it before these came into effect (not sure when this was - quite a while ago though!).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
CHU-LIP
post Aug 9 2010, 09:45 PM
Post #39


Giovanissimi Nazionali
*******

Group: Full Members
Posts: 3,601
Joined: 22-February 10
Member No.: 7,230



QUOTE (m1ke @ Aug 9 2010, 08:35 PM) *
Hmm - just had a look at this. The limits are currently 150:500:200 (SIZE(kb):WIDTH(px):HEIGHT(px)). If anyone has a sig that falls outside of either of these values, then it's probably because they had it before these came into effect (not sure when this was - quite a while ago though!).

Djeez. EVERYONE can make that conclusion within a second, but isn't a bit unfair, stupid, not consistent, etc. if some still can keep those big sigs while others can't? Either one of the two needs to adapt to the others.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
m1ke
post Aug 9 2010, 09:51 PM
Post #40


Administrator
*******

Group: Admin
Posts: 4,291
Joined: 1-July 05
From: London
Member No.: 1



Call it a 'perk' for being an old-school Milanfan member.

However, in the interest of keeping the peace (as I understand sig's are a hot topic (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) ) - this will be changing soon(ish).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
d'Arc.LP
post Aug 9 2010, 10:10 PM
Post #41


Giovanissimi Nazionali
*******

Group: Full Members
Posts: 3,717
Joined: 3-September 09
From: Kosova
Member No.: 6,786



m1ke i think the limit (width) for signature should be bigger.
400x150 at least.

Still that's your decision to make (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
m1ke
post Aug 9 2010, 11:27 PM
Post #42


Administrator
*******

Group: Admin
Posts: 4,291
Joined: 1-July 05
From: London
Member No.: 1



^^ Hi mate - the limit should be 500(w) x 200(h)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
MizNelson
post Aug 30 2010, 09:37 AM
Post #43


Dida per sempre
*******

Group: Full Members
Posts: 4,198
Joined: 25-February 07
From: St. Francis
Member No.: 3,563



Still can't change my signature, and my new image is only 275px wide.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
m1ke
post Aug 30 2010, 01:30 PM
Post #44


Administrator
*******

Group: Admin
Posts: 4,291
Joined: 1-July 05
From: London
Member No.: 1



And what's the filesize in kb?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

 
abanovac
post Sep 2 2010, 01:59 PM
Post #45


Pulcini 99
*

Group: Full Members
Posts: 31
Joined: 17-August 10
From: Geelong
Member No.: 7,704



please increase the max size of signatures. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) thankyou
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post


5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 08:35 PM