I'm pretty sure it's true (I remember reading about it way back), but that still doesn't change the fact that this guy who wrote the article is just stating the obvious.
It's easy to write something like this now after Torres has made a good start, but I'd don't believe even Liverpool believed he would have had this much of an impact in his first season. If I wrote articles about every decent player who didn't end up at Milan, I'd never have time to finish v2
Well, we do need a good striker, but I'm not sure if Torres would have been a good buy for us...
On the other hand, Juve's Kaka loss is a bit more important than this p
we signed olivera because he was the la liga leading goal scorer the season before we signed him.
i understand people say (insert name here) is a great striker, he would be great at milan. problem is we have to look at the style of play the coach employs. the thing is olivera was proven, torres was not. olivera proved to be inconsistant here (granted not given enough time to really shine plus his sisters abduction) and who could truly say how torres would have faired. in that time frame we have been 3 to CL finals winning 2 of them. so i wouldn't change the past except for this past season and the summer signings.
What makes anyone thing he'd fit in at Milan?
I'd like to see how many of his goals were assisted by Gerrard, and Milan do not have Gerrard, so..
I suppose we can always think of what could have been, but it isn't, and never will be. So let's not dwell on it and look at another top player that we probably won't sign.
Bla bla bla. Always the same.
He's only one of lots of players we missed.
i would rather have pato signed than torres to be honest. Torres is brilliant but liverpool fit his style perfectly. I'm afraid he'll become like gila if he came here, start good and flop.
Gila didn't even start.. "good"...
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)