QUOTE (dst @ Jul 8 2008, 02:35 PM)
You said some time ago that you think the Euro is stronger than the WC cause in the WC there are more small teams...
And the Champions League is like the World Cup. Too many small teams, so I'm being consistant with my opinion. The old European Cup didn't have many small teams - only those that were fortunate enough to win their league title, that's why I prefer that format, that's all I'm saying.
QUOTE (dst @ Jul 8 2008, 02:35 PM)
But really... second rate compared to what?
2nd rate doesn't mean you have to be 2nd best to something in my opinion. Like some would consider Celtic and Rangers 2nd rate teams, yet they're two of the most - if not THE most - succesful teams in the history of the sport.
QUOTE (dst @ Jul 8 2008, 02:35 PM)
Does the name annoy you so much? What if it was called European Cup again, would anything change?
The name doesn't annoy me, I just think it sounds stupid.
QUOTE (LaPalma @ Jul 8 2008, 06:31 PM)
I don't think the UEFA Cup will have to stay a 2nd rate competition. 10-15 years ago it was a highly respected and prestigious trophy.
And of course there's still a lot of big teams playing there. Not Champions League big...but this year it has Milan, Valencia, Samp, Sevilla and Hamburg.
I've always seen the UEFA Cup as a decent trophy. Look at some of the teams that've won it recently - Porto and Sevilla inparticular - and they're hardly crap sides. One nearly won La Liga, the other won the European Cup.